Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul Veterans Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Preventive Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Sep;25(9):2921-2928. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4050-0. Epub 2016 Feb 20.
This meta-analysis was designed to compare clinical outcomes, including knee scale score and nonunion rate, of patients with periprosthetic supracondylar fractures of the distal femur after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) who were treated using locking compression plates and retrograde intramedullary nails.
Studies were included in this meta-analysis if they compared clinical outcomes, including operation time, Knee Society Score (KSS), time to union, nonunion rate, and revision rate due to nonunion, in patients who underwent locking compression plate or retrograde intramedullary nail for periprosthetic distal femur fractures following TKA.
Eight studies were included in this meta-analysis. Mean operation time was 11 min shorter (95 % CI -9.56 to 31.33 min; n.s.) and KSS one point higher (95 % CI -8.88 to 11.10; n.s.) with retrograde intramedullary nail than with locking compression plate, but these differences were not statistically significant. The two groups were also similar in mean time to union (0.46 weeks 95 % CI -1.17 to 2.08 weeks; n.s.), the proportion of subjects with nonunion (OR 0.83, 95 % CI 0.26-2.60; n.s.) and the proportion that underwent revision surgery (OR 0.88, 95 % CI 0.32-2.40; n.s.).
Clinical outcomes, including nonunion and revision rates, were similar in patients who underwent locking compression plate and retrograde intramedullary nail fixation for periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fracture following TKA. Orthopaedic surgeons must train to master both the retrograde intramedullary nail and locking compression plate techniques because both approaches can be considered for periprosthetic distal femur fracture after TKA as they have similar clinicoradiologic outcomes.
II.
本荟萃分析旨在比较全膝关节置换术(TKA)后髁上假体周围股骨远端骨折患者采用锁定加压钢板和逆行髓内钉治疗的临床结果,包括膝关节评分和非愈合率。
如果研究比较了全膝关节置换术后髁上假体周围股骨远端骨折患者采用锁定加压钢板或逆行髓内钉治疗的手术时间、膝关节学会评分(KSS)、愈合时间、非愈合率和非愈合导致的翻修率等临床结果,则将其纳入本荟萃分析。
本荟萃分析纳入了 8 项研究。与锁定加压钢板相比,逆行髓内钉组的平均手术时间缩短 11 分钟(95%CI-9.56 至 31.33 分钟;无统计学意义),KSS 评分高 1 分(95%CI-8.88 至 11.10;无统计学意义),但这些差异无统计学意义。两组的平均愈合时间(0.46 周 95%CI-1.17 至 2.08 周;无统计学意义)、不愈合率(OR 0.83,95%CI-0.26 至 2.60;无统计学意义)和翻修手术率(OR 0.88,95%CI-0.32 至 2.40;无统计学意义)也相似。
TKA 后髁上假体周围股骨远端骨折采用锁定加压钢板和逆行髓内钉固定的患者,临床结果(包括不愈合率和翻修率)相似。骨科医生必须接受培训,掌握逆行髓内钉和锁定加压钢板技术,因为这两种方法都可以考虑用于 TKA 后髁上假体周围股骨远端骨折,因为它们具有相似的临床影像学结果。
II 级。