Jahanbin Arezoo, Hasanzadeh Nadia, Khaki Sara, Shafaee Hooman
Dental Research Center, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2019 Fall;13(4):281-288. doi: 10.15171/joddd.2019.043.
Self-ligating brackets might be more efficient than conventional appliance systems during the initial alignment stage of orthodontic treatment due to reduced frictional resistance. This study aimed to compare the alignment efficiency and pain experience of Damon3 self-ligating and MBT pre-adjusted brackets in the initial alignment stage. In this randomized clinical trial, 30 patients aged 14‒20 years, who needed non-extraction treatment in both maxillary and mandibular arches, were randomly assigned to two groups; 15 patients were treated with MBT pre-adjusted brackets, and 15 patients received Damon3 self-ligating brackets, both with 0.022-in slots. Alginate impressions were taken at the start of treatment (T0) and four monthly visits (T1, T2, T3, and T4). Little's irregularity index (LII) was used to assess the tooth displacements. The patients rated their pain experience immediately after the insertion of the archwire, 4 hours, 24 hours, 3 days, 7 days, and at each monthly visit using a visual analog scale (VAS). The rate of upper dental alignment between T0 and T4 was significantly higher with the Damon3 compared to MBT brackets (P=0.015). Although significantly more changes in the lower LII scores were observed during the first three months with the Damon3 system, the rate of improvement in the irregularity of lower teeth over the 4-month period was not significantly different between the two groups (P=0.50). The patients' pain experience was not significantly different between the bracket groups (P=0.29). During the four-month alignment stage, significantly more improvement in the upper dental irregularity was observed with self-ligating compared to conventional brackets. The bracket type had no effect on pain experience during the alignment stage.
由于摩擦力减小,在正畸治疗的初始排齐阶段,自锁托槽可能比传统矫治系统更有效。本研究旨在比较Damon3自锁托槽和MBT预调式托槽在初始排齐阶段的排齐效率和疼痛感受。在这项随机临床试验中,将30名年龄在14至20岁、上下颌均需要非拔牙矫治的患者随机分为两组;15名患者使用MBT预调式托槽进行治疗,15名患者使用Damon3自锁托槽,两种托槽均为0.022英寸槽沟。在治疗开始时(T0)以及之后的四次每月复诊(T1、T2、T3和T4)时取藻酸盐印模。使用Little不整齐指数(LII)评估牙齿移位情况。患者在弓丝插入后即刻、4小时、24小时、3天、7天以及每次每月复诊时,使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)对疼痛感受进行评分。与MBT托槽相比,Damon3托槽在T0至T4期间上颌牙齿排齐率显著更高(P = 0.015)。尽管在最初三个月中,Damon3系统观察到下颌LII评分的变化明显更多,但两组在4个月期间下颌牙齿不整齐的改善率无显著差异(P = 0.50)。两组患者的疼痛感受无显著差异(P = 0.29)。在四个月的排齐阶段,与传统托槽相比,自锁托槽在上颌牙齿不整齐方面的改善更为显著。托槽类型在排齐阶段对疼痛感受没有影响。