Department of thoracic surgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Thorac Cancer. 2020 May;11(5):1265-1270. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13391. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
IBM Watson for Oncology (WFO) provides physicians with evidence-based treatment options. This study was designed to explore the concordance of the suggested therapeutic regimen for advanced non-small cell lung (NSCLC) cancer patients between the updated version of WFO and physicians in our department, in order to reflect the differences of cancer treatment between China and the United States.
Retrospective data from 165 patients with advanced NSCLC from September 2014 to March 2018 were entered manually into WFO. WFO recommendations were provided in three categories: recommended, for consideration, and not recommended. Concordance was analyzed by comparing the treatment decisions proposed by WFO with the real treatment. Potential influenced factors were also analyzed.
Overall, the treatment recommendations were concordant in 73.3% (121/165) of cases. When two alternative drugs such as icotinib and nedaplatin were included as "for consideration," the total consistency could be elevated from 73.3% to 90.3%(149/165). The logistic regression analysis showed that gender (P = 0.096), ECOG (P = 0.0.502), smoking (P = 0.455), and pathology (P = 0.633) had no effect on consistency, but stages (P = 0.019), including stage ≤III (77.8%, 21/27) and stage IV (93.5%, 129/138) had significant effects on consistency.
In China, most of the treatment recommendations of WFO are consistent with the real world treatment. Factors such as patient preferences, prices, drug approval and medical insurance are also taken into consideration, and they ultimately affect the inconsistency. To be comprehensively and rapidly applied in China, localization needs to be accelerated by WFO.
IBM Watson for Oncology(WFO)为医生提供基于证据的治疗方案。本研究旨在探索 WFO 最新版本与我院医生为晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者建议的治疗方案之间的一致性,以反映中美两国癌症治疗的差异。
回顾性纳入 2014 年 9 月至 2018 年 3 月我院收治的 165 例晚期 NSCLC 患者的临床资料,手动输入至 WFO。WFO 提供了三种治疗建议类别:推荐、考虑和不推荐。通过比较 WFO 提出的治疗建议与实际治疗,分析一致性。同时还分析了潜在的影响因素。
总体而言,在 165 例患者中,73.3%(121/165)的治疗建议是一致的。当将伊可替尼和奈达铂等两种替代药物纳入“考虑”类别时,总一致性可从 73.3%提高到 90.3%(149/165)。Logistic 回归分析显示,性别(P=0.096)、ECOG(P=0.0502)、吸烟状况(P=0.455)和病理类型(P=0.633)对一致性无影响,但分期(P=0.019),包括ⅠB 期(77.8%,21/27)和Ⅳ期(93.5%,129/138)对一致性有显著影响。
在中国,WFO 的大部分治疗建议与实际治疗一致。患者的偏好、价格、药物批准和医疗保险等因素也会被考虑在内,最终影响治疗方案的不一致性。为了在我国得到全面快速的应用,WFO 需要加快本地化进程。