Suppr超能文献

复方局部麻醉剂与苯佐卡因疗效比较的初步研究。

Comparing the Efficacy of a Compound Topical Anesthetic Versus Benzocaine: A Pilot Study.

作者信息

Park Lydia, Tom James, Bui Nicole, Wilson Melissa, Tanbonliong Thomas

机构信息

Herman Ostrow School of Dentistry, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.

Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.

出版信息

Anesth Prog. 2020 Spring;67(1):9-15. doi: 10.2344/anpr-66-03-05.

Abstract

To compare the effectiveness of a combination of 10% lidocaine, 10% prilocaine, and 4% tetracaine versus 20% benzocaine for use as a topical anesthetic agent prior to dental injections. A double-blind randomized prospective clinical trial was conducted with 26 participants receiving a topical anesthetic of 20% benzocaine (control) and 26 participants receiving a compound topical anesthetic mixture of 10% lidocaine, 10% prilocaine, and 4% tetracaine (experimental) prior to a maxillary infiltration injection. The procedure was conducted by 1 operator with the Wand injection system. Pain was assessed directly with visual analog scale (VAS) scores and indirectly by measuring changes in heart rate at 4 different time points. Complications associated with the application of the topical anesthetics were also assessed. The experimental group had a significantly higher mean VAS score of 19.5 ± 19.7 mm versus 14.2 ± 14.6 mm for the control group ( < .001). No significant differences in heart rate at any of the 4 measured time points compared with baseline were noted for either group. The experimental group had a significantly higher incidence of complications, including tissue sloughing, when compared with the control group ( < .001). Participants in the control group reported significantly lower VAS scores than those in the experimental group. Both types of topical anesthetic showed similar impacts on alterations to heart rate. No benefits were seen with the use of 10% lidocaine, 10% prilocaine, and 4% tetracaine as a topical anesthetic prior to a maxillary infiltration of local anesthetic when compared with 20% benzocaine.

摘要

比较10%利多卡因、10%丙胺卡因和4%丁卡因的组合与20%苯佐卡因作为牙科注射前局部麻醉剂的有效性。进行了一项双盲随机前瞻性临床试验,26名参与者在进行上颌浸润注射前接受20%苯佐卡因的局部麻醉(对照组),26名参与者接受10%利多卡因、10%丙胺卡因和4%丁卡因的复合局部麻醉混合物(试验组)。该操作由1名操作人员使用Wand注射系统进行。通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分直接评估疼痛,并通过测量4个不同时间点心率的变化间接评估疼痛。还评估了与局部麻醉剂应用相关的并发症。试验组的平均VAS评分显著高于对照组,分别为19.5±19.7mm和14.2±14.6mm(<0.001)。两组在4个测量时间点的心率与基线相比均无显著差异。与对照组相比,试验组的并发症发生率显著更高,包括组织脱落(<0.001)。对照组参与者报告的VAS评分显著低于试验组。两种局部麻醉剂对心率变化的影响相似。与20%苯佐卡因相比,在进行上颌局部麻醉浸润前使用10%利多卡因、10%丙胺卡因和4%丁卡因作为局部麻醉剂未见益处。

相似文献

1
Comparing the Efficacy of a Compound Topical Anesthetic Versus Benzocaine: A Pilot Study.
Anesth Prog. 2020 Spring;67(1):9-15. doi: 10.2344/anpr-66-03-05.
4
Comparison of topical anesthetics (EMLA/Oraqix vs. benzocaine) on pain experienced during palatal needle injection.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 May;103(5):e16-20. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.11.033. Epub 2007 Feb 27.
8
Efficacy of intraoral topical anesthetics in children.
J Dent. 2006 Jul;34(6):398-404. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2005.09.002. Epub 2005 Oct 18.
9
Efficacy of Topical Benzocaine in Maxilla: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Anesth Prog. 2019 Spring;66(1):24-29. doi: 10.2344/anpr-66-01-01.

本文引用的文献

2
5
Topical anesthesia.
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Oct-Dec;31(4):450-6. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.169049.
7
Efficacy of Different Precooling Agents and Topical Anesthetics on the Pain Perception during Intraoral Injection: A Comparative Clinical Study.
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015 May-Aug;8(2):119-22. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1296. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
9
Compounded topical anesthetics in orthodontics.
J Clin Orthod. 2015 Jun;49(6):371-7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验