Tang M, Falk J L
Department of Psychology, Busch, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08903.
Alcohol. 1988 Sep-Oct;5(5):399-402. doi: 10.1016/0741-8329(88)90027-4.
Two groups of rats were given differential schedule-induced polydipsia histories. One had a history of choosing between 5% ethanol and 0.7% glucose solution (dilute, mildly acceptable), in daily, 3-hr, fixed-time 1-min schedules of food-pellet delivery, while the other similarly treated group chose between 5% ethanol and 5% glucose (highly acceptable). A 30-day period, wherein only 5% ethanol was available during daily sessions, intervened before session-fluid preferences were evaluated by pitting a series of glucose solutions of increasing concentration (0.7-5.0%) against 5% ethanol. The group which had a remote history of having chosen 5% glucose solution in preference to 5% ethanol imbibed less 5% ethanol during the series of glucose-ethanol acceptability preference tests. Hence, they were less vulnerable to a continuance of their ethanol overindulgence than the group with the remote history of having chosen 5% ethanol over the dilute glucose solution.
两组大鼠被给予不同的日程诱导多饮史。一组有在5%乙醇和0.7%葡萄糖溶液(稀释的、轻度可接受的)之间进行选择的历史,在每日3小时固定时间1分钟的食物颗粒投放日程中,而另一组同样处理的大鼠在5%乙醇和5%葡萄糖(高度可接受的)之间进行选择。在通过使一系列浓度递增的葡萄糖溶液(0.7 - 5.0%)与5%乙醇进行对比来评估实验期间液体偏好之前,有一个为期30天的阶段,在此期间每日实验时段仅提供5%乙醇。在一系列葡萄糖 - 乙醇可接受性偏好测试中,曾有选择5%葡萄糖溶液而非5%乙醇的遥远历史的那组大鼠饮用的5%乙醇较少。因此,与有选择5%乙醇而非稀释葡萄糖溶液的遥远历史的组相比,它们较不易于持续过度饮用乙醇。