Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/senthil_selv.
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Apr 14;75(14):1644-1656. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.02.009. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
Guidelines recommend targeting systolic blood pressure (SBP) <130 mm Hg in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) with limited data.
This study sought to determine the optimal achieved SBP and whether the treatment effects of sacubitril/valsartan on outcomes are related to BP lowering, particularly among women who derive greater benefit from sacubitril/valsartan.
Using 4,795 trial participants, this study related baseline and time-updated mean achieved SBP quartiles (<120, 120 to 129, 130 to 139, ≥140 mm Hg) to the primary outcome (cardiovascular death and total heart failure hospitalization), its components, myocardial infarction or stroke, and a renal composite outcome. At the 16-week visit, the study assessed the relationship between SBP change and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire overall summary score (KCCQ-OSS) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). The study analyzed whether the BP-lowering effects of sacubitril/valsartan accounted for its treatment effects.
Average age was 73 ± 8 years, and 52% of participants were women. After multivariable adjustment, baseline and mean achieved SBP of 120 to 129 mm Hg demonstrated the lowest risk for all outcomes. Sacubitril/valsartan reduced SBP by 5.2 mm Hg (95% confidence interval: 4.4 to 6.0) compared with valsartan at 4 weeks, which was not modified by baseline SBP. However, sacubitril/valsartan reduced SBP more in women (6.3 mm Hg) than men (4.0 mm Hg) (interaction p = 0.005). Change in SBP was directly associated with change in NT-proBNP (p < 0.001) but not KCCQ-OSS (p = 0.40). The association between sacubitril/valsartan and the primary outcome was not modified by baseline SBP (interaction p = 0.50) and was similar when adjusting for time-updated SBP, regardless of sex.
Baseline and mean achieved SBP of 120 to 129 mm Hg identified the lowest risk patients with HFpEF. Baseline SBP did not modify the treatment effect of sacubitril/valsartan, and the BP-lowering effects of sacubitril/valsartan did not account for its effects on outcomes, regardless of sex. (Prospective Comparison of ARNI With ARB Global Outcomes in HF With Preserved Ejection Fraction [PARAGON-HF]; NCT01920711).
指南建议射血分数保留的心衰(HFpEF)患者的收缩压(SBP)目标值<130mmHg,但目前相关数据有限。
本研究旨在确定最佳的实际 SBP 值,并探讨沙库巴曲缬沙坦的治疗效果是否与降压有关,特别是在那些从沙库巴曲缬沙坦中获益更多的女性中。
本研究利用 4795 名试验参与者,将基线和时间更新的平均实际 SBP 四分位数(<120mmHg、120-129mmHg、130-139mmHg、≥140mmHg)与主要结局(心血管死亡和全因心衰住院)、其组成部分(心肌梗死或卒中)以及肾脏复合结局相关联。在 16 周时,研究评估了 SBP 变化与堪萨斯城心肌病问卷总评分(KCCQ-OSS)和 N 末端 pro-B 型利钠肽(NT-proBNP)之间的关系。研究分析了沙库巴曲缬沙坦的降压效果是否解释了其治疗效果。
平均年龄为 73±8 岁,52%的参与者为女性。经过多变量调整后,120-129mmHg 的基线和平均实际 SBP 显示出所有结局的最低风险。与缬沙坦相比,沙库巴曲缬沙坦在 4 周时降低 SBP 5.2mmHg(95%置信区间:4.4 至 6.0),且不受基线 SBP 的影响。然而,沙库巴曲缬沙坦在女性(6.3mmHg)中降低 SBP 的幅度大于男性(4.0mmHg)(交互作用 p=0.005)。SBP 的变化与 NT-proBNP 的变化直接相关(p<0.001),但与 KCCQ-OSS 的变化无关(p=0.40)。沙库巴曲缬沙坦与主要结局之间的关联不受基线 SBP 的影响(交互作用 p=0.50),并且无论性别如何,在调整时间更新的 SBP 后,结果相似。
120-129mmHg 的基线和平均实际 SBP 确定了 HFpEF 患者的最低风险。基线 SBP 并未改变沙库巴曲缬沙坦的治疗效果,并且无论性别如何,沙库巴曲缬沙坦的降压效果都不能解释其对结局的影响。(前瞻性比较 ARNI 与 ARB 在心衰伴射血分数保留患者中的全球结局研究[PARAGON-HF];NCT01920711)。