A Study of Patient Satisfaction and Uncertainty in a Rapid Access Chest Pain Clinic.

BACKGROUND

A number of Australian hospitals are piloting outpatient rapid access chest pain clinics (RACC) as a new clinical pathway. These clinics aim to provide an alternative to inpatient care for timely access to specialist cardiology assessment whilst improving quality of care and experience. An understanding of overall patient satisfaction can be considered a marker of overall clinical success, contributes to cost-effectiveness, and is needed to develop improvement strategies. We aimed to evaluate uncertainty, satisfaction and experience among patients treated in a RACC.

METHODS

All consecutive patients presenting with troponin negative intermediate risk chest pain treated in a new RACC in a public quaternary teaching hospital over a 12-month period, were invited to participate in two core components: A paper-based questionnaire, and a one-month follow-up telephone structured interview. Patient satisfaction and uncertainty were assessed by the short form of the Mishel Uncertainty in Illness Scale (MUIS) and Picker Dimensions of care.

RESULTS

There was a 51.2% response rate (190/371). Patients ranged in age from 20 to 89 years (56.4±13.6 years) and 47% were female. Findings illustrated a global high level of satisfaction in all areas: care, comfort, communication and engagement, with low levels of uncertainty in illness experienced by patients.

CONCLUSION

There were high levels of satisfaction and minimal uncertainty for patients related to their management and care in the RACC during the study period. These results have formed part of the formal cost-effectiveness assessment of the RACC used to support its transition from a pilot implementation to standard of care at the study centre.