Suppr超能文献

对每日和每周一次的“一站式”快速评估胸痛诊所的活动及结果进行的审计。

An audit of activity and outcome from a daily and a weekly "one stop" rapid assessment chest pain clinic.

作者信息

Byrne J, Murdoch D, Morrison C, McMurray J

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

Postgrad Med J. 2002 Jan;78(915):43-6. doi: 10.1136/pmj.78.915.43.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The recent National Service Framework for coronary heart disease advocates the establishment of rapid assessment clinics for chest pain. But how should these clinics be organised and do they fulfil their objectives? The aim of this study was to compare referral patterns to a daily and a weekly "one stop" rapid access chest pain clinic (RACPC), and to examine clinical outcome in patients attending these clinics.

DESIGN

Patients were prospectively categorised into one of the following subgroups: "acute coronary syndrome", "stable coronary heart disease", or "low risk/non-coronary chest pain". Fatal and non-fatal outcomes were audited over eight months.

SETTING

Both RACPCs were situated within the cardiology departments of two large Glasgow teaching hospitals. Patients were seen by a cardiologist, and underwent non-invasive testing.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 633 patients with chest pain who were referred by their general practitioner; 500 came to the daily and 133 to the weekly clinic. Forty four (7%) were categorised as having an acute coronary syndrome, 267 (42%) as stable coronary artery disease, and 322 (51%) as low risk/non-coronary chest pain.

RESULTS

Referral patterns to the two clinics differed significantly. Compared with the weekly clinic, more patients with an acute coronary syndrome (7.8 v. 3.8%) and low risk/non-coronary chest pain (55.2 v. 35.6%), but fewer patients with stable coronary disease (37.0 v. 61.6%) were referred to the daily clinic (p<0.00001). During follow up eight (1.3%) patients died from a cardiac cause, and eight (1.3%) patients suffered a myocardial infarction. None of these patients were classified as low risk/non-coronary chest pain.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) RACPCs do provide an effective tool for the early assessment of patients with possible angina. (2) The frequency with which clinics are scheduled may be an important factor in determining how the service is utilised in practice.

摘要

目的

最近的冠心病国家服务框架提倡设立胸痛快速评估诊所。但这些诊所应如何组织,它们是否实现了目标?本研究的目的是比较转诊至每日一次和每周一次的“一站式”快速胸痛诊所(RACPC)的模式,并检查就诊于这些诊所的患者的临床结局。

设计

前瞻性地将患者分为以下亚组之一:“急性冠状动脉综合征”、“稳定型冠心病”或“低风险/非冠状动脉性胸痛”。对八个月内的致命和非致命结局进行审核。

地点

两个RACPC均位于格拉斯哥两家大型教学医院的心脏病科内。患者由心脏病专家诊治,并接受无创检查。

参与者

共有633例因胸痛由全科医生转诊的患者;500例前往每日诊所,133例前往每周诊所。44例(7%)被归类为患有急性冠状动脉综合征,267例(42%)为稳定型冠状动脉疾病,322例(51%)为低风险/非冠状动脉性胸痛。

结果

转诊至两家诊所的模式有显著差异。与每周诊所相比,更多急性冠状动脉综合征患者(7.8%对3.8%)和低风险/非冠状动脉性胸痛患者(55.2%对35.6%)被转诊至每日诊所,但稳定型冠心病患者较少(37.0%对61.6%)(p<0.00001)。在随访期间,8例(1.3%)患者死于心脏原因,8例(1.3%)患者发生心肌梗死。这些患者均未被归类为低风险/非冠状动脉性胸痛。

结论

(1)RACPC确实为早期评估可能患有心绞痛的患者提供了一种有效工具。(2)诊所安排的频率可能是决定该服务在实际中如何被利用的一个重要因素。

相似文献

2
Long-term outcome of low-risk patients attending a rapid-assessment chest pain clinic.
Heart. 2008 May;94(5):628-32. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2007.125344. Epub 2007 Oct 4.
3
Suspected angina pectoris: a rapid-access chest pain clinic.
QJM. 2001 Dec;94(12):679-86. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/94.12.679.
5
Rapid-access chest pain clinics and the traditional cardiology out-patient clinic.
QJM. 2006 Mar;99(3):135-41. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcl013. Epub 2006 Feb 14.
6
Evaluating the benefits of a rapid access chest pain clinic in Australia.
Med J Aust. 2019 Apr;210(7):321-325. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50021. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
7
A nurse-led rapid access chest pain clinic--experience from the first 3 years.
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2005 Sep;4(3):227-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2005.03.003.
9
A Rapid Access Chest Pain Clinic (RACPC): Initial Australian Experience.
Heart Lung Circ. 2018 Nov;27(11):1376-1380. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Dec 11.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Missed diagnoses of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department.
N Engl J Med. 2000 Apr 20;342(16):1163-70. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200004203421603.
4
Outcome from a rapid-assessment chest pain clinic.
QJM. 1998 May;91(5):339-43. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/91.5.339.
6
Experience of a rapid access acute chest pain clinic.
Ir Med J. 1997 Jun-Jul;90(4):139-40.
7
Re-admissions among patients with acute chest pain who were discharged from the emergency department.
Eur J Emerg Med. 1996 Mar;3(1):31-5. doi: 10.1097/00063110-199603000-00006.
9
Incidence, clinical characteristics, and short-term prognosis of angina pectoris.
Br Heart J. 1995 Feb;73(2):193-8. doi: 10.1136/hrt.73.2.193.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验