• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

劳伦斯 D. 多尔外科技术与技术奖:初次全髋关节置换术后一年内无菌再手术显著增加了后期假体周围关节感染的风险。

The Lawrence D. Dorr Surgical Techniques & Technologies Award: Aseptic Reoperations Within One Year of Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Markedly Increase the Risk of Later Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jun;35(6S):S10-S14. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.054. Epub 2020 Feb 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.054
PMID:32192836
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the success of primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs), some patients will require an aseptic reoperation within 1 year of the index THA. The goal of this study is to evaluate the risk of subsequent periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in patients undergoing an aseptic reoperation within 1 year of a primary THA.

METHODS

A retrospective review utilizing our institutional joint registry identified 211 primary THAs requiring aseptic reoperation within 1 year following index arthroplasty. A control group of 15,357 primary THAs not requiring reoperation within 1 year was identified. Patients were divided into groups based on time from primary THA to reoperation: (1) within 90 days (n = 112 THAs; 40% for dislocation, 34% for periprosthetic fracture) or (2) 91-365 days (n = 99 THAs; 37% for dislocation, 29% for periprosthetic fracture). Mean follow-up was 7 years.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing an aseptic reoperation within 90 days had a PJI rate of 4.8% at 2 years, while the 91-365 day group had a PJI rate of 3.2% at 2 years. The control group had a PJI rate of 0.2% at 2 years. Employing a multivariate analysis, reoperation within 90 days of index arthroplasty had an elevated risk of PJI (hazard ratio 8, P < .001) as did a reoperation between 91 and 365 days (hazard ratio 13, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Aseptic reoperations within 1 year following primary THA resulted in an 8- to 13-fold increased risk of subsequent PJI. The risk was similar whether the aseptic reoperation was early (within 90 days) or later (91-365 days).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III (Prognostic).

摘要

背景

尽管初次全髋关节置换术(THA)取得了成功,但仍有部分患者在初次 THA 后 1 年内需要进行无菌性翻修手术。本研究旨在评估初次 THA 后 1 年内行无菌性翻修手术患者发生假体周围关节感染(PJI)的风险。

方法

利用我院关节登记处进行回顾性研究,共纳入 211 例初次 THA 后 1 年内需行无菌性翻修手术的患者。另选取 15357 例初次 THA 后 1 年内无需翻修手术的患者作为对照组。根据初次 THA 至翻修手术的时间将患者分为两组:(1)90 天内(n=112 例;40%为脱位,34%为假体周围骨折)或(2)91-365 天内(n=99 例;37%为脱位,29%为假体周围骨折)。平均随访时间为 7 年。

结果

90 天内行无菌性翻修手术的患者在第 2 年时 PJI 发生率为 4.8%,而 91-365 天内行无菌性翻修手术的患者在第 2 年时 PJI 发生率为 3.2%。对照组在第 2 年时 PJI 发生率为 0.2%。多因素分析显示,初次 THA 后 90 天内行翻修手术(风险比 8,P<0.001)和 91-365 天行翻修手术(风险比 13,P<0.001)均会增加 PJI 的发生风险。

结论

初次 THA 后 1 年内行无菌性翻修手术会使随后发生 PJI 的风险增加 8-13 倍。无论无菌性翻修手术是早期(90 天内)还是晚期(91-365 天)进行,风险都相似。

证据等级

III 级(预后)。

相似文献

1
The Lawrence D. Dorr Surgical Techniques & Technologies Award: Aseptic Reoperations Within One Year of Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Markedly Increase the Risk of Later Periprosthetic Joint Infection.劳伦斯 D. 多尔外科技术与技术奖:初次全髋关节置换术后一年内无菌再手术显著增加了后期假体周围关节感染的风险。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jun;35(6S):S10-S14. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.054. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
2
Aseptic Reoperations Within 1 Year of Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Markedly Increase the Risk of Later Periprosthetic Joint Infection.初次全膝关节置换术后 1 年内进行无菌再手术显著增加了后期发生假体周围关节感染的风险。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Dec;35(12):3668-3672. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.06.054. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
3
Early Periprosthetic Femur Fractures After Primary Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty: High Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infection and Subsequent Reoperation.初次非骨水泥全髋关节置换术后早期股骨假体周围骨折:假体周围关节感染和后续再手术的高风险。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Apr;39(4):1083-1087.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.10.037. Epub 2023 Oct 21.
4
Periprosthetic joint infection in aseptic total hip arthroplasty revision.无菌性全髋关节置换翻修术中的假体周围关节感染
Int Orthop. 2020 Apr;44(4):735-741. doi: 10.1007/s00264-019-04366-2. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
5
Risk of Prosthetic Joint Infection Increases Following Early Aseptic Revision Surgery of Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.初次髋关节和膝关节置换术后早期无菌翻修手术会增加人工关节感染的风险。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Dec;35(12):3661-3667. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.06.089. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
6
Extended Oral Antibiotic Prophylaxis After Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Does It Decrease Infection Risk?无菌性翻修全髋关节置换术后延长口服抗生素预防性用药:能否降低感染风险?
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Dec;37(12):2460-2465. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.06.023. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
7
Elevated Infection and Complication Rates in Patients Undergoing a Primary THA With a History of a PJI in a Prior Hip or Knee Arthroplasty: A Matched Cohort Study.初次髋关节或膝关节置换术后有感染性关节炎病史的患者行初次全髋关节置换术时感染和并发症发生率升高:一项匹配队列研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jul;35(7):1928-1932. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.018. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
8
Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Infection: Is an Ipsilateral Uninfected Total Joint Arthroplasty at Risk?人工髋关节和膝关节感染:同侧未感染的全关节置换术是否有风险?
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Sep;39(9S2):S425-S428. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.03.034. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
9
No Difference in the Rate of Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Patients Undergoing the Posterolateral Compared to the Direct Anterior Approach.后路与直接前路入路患者的假体周围关节感染率无差异。
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Jun;38(6):1089-1095. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.03.003. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
10
Outcomes of primary total hip arthroplasty following septic arthritis of the hip : a case-control study.髋关节化脓性关节炎初次全髋关节置换术的疗效:病例对照研究。
Bone Joint J. 2022 Feb;104-B(2):227-234. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B2.BJJ-2021-1209.R1.

引用本文的文献

1
Debulking of the Femoral Stem in a Primary Total Hip Joint Replacement: A Novel Method to Reduce Stress Shielding.初次全髋关节置换术中股骨柄减容:一种减轻应力遮挡的新方法
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Apr 18;11(4):393. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11040393.
2
Global mapping of institutional and hospital-based (Level II-IV) arthroplasty registries: a scoping review.全球范围内机构和医院为基础(二级至四级)关节置换术登记处的绘制:范围综述。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Feb;34(2):1219-1251. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03691-y. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
3
Managing early complications in total hip arthroplasty: the safety of immediate revision.

本文引用的文献

1
Novel Coronavirus and Orthopaedic Surgery: Early Experiences from Singapore.新型冠状病毒与骨科手术:来自新加坡的早期经验
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 May 6;102(9):745-749. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.00236.
2
Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing surgeries during the incubation period of COVID-19 infection.新型冠状病毒肺炎感染潜伏期接受手术患者的临床特征及预后
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Apr 5;21:100331. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100331. eCollection 2020 Apr.
3
Survey of COVID-19 Disease Among Orthopaedic Surgeons in Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
全髋关节置换术后早期并发症的处理:即刻翻修的安全性。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2023 Jul 31;24(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s10195-023-00719-1.
4
Early aseptic reoperation after shoulder arthroplasty increases risk of subsequent prosthetic joint infection.肩关节置换术后早期无菌翻修会增加随后发生人工关节感染的风险。
JSES Int. 2021 Aug 5;5(6):1067-1071. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.06.002. eCollection 2021 Nov.
中国武汉骨科医生中 COVID-19 疾病调查。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 May 20;102(10):847-854. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.00417.
4
Epidemiology of Covid-19 in a Long-Term Care Facility in King County, Washington.华盛顿州金县长期护理机构中 COVID-19 的流行病学。
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 21;382(21):2005-2011. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2005412. Epub 2020 Mar 27.