Suppr超能文献

成人骨科创伤人群中的低价值创伤治疗:快速综述方案。

Low-value injury care in the adult orthopaedic trauma population: a protocol for a rapid review.

机构信息

Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit, Trauma - Emergency - Critical Care Medicine, Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec - Université Laval (Hôpital de l'Enfant-Jésus), Québec City, Québec, Canada

Faculty of Nursing, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 18;10(3):e033453. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033453.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Orthopaedic injuries affect almost 90% of trauma patients. A previous scoping review and expert consultation survey identified 15 potential low-value intra-hospital practices in the adult orthopaedic trauma population. Limiting the frequency of such practices could reduce adverse events, improve clinical outcomes and free up resources. The aim of this study is to synthesise the evidence on intra-hospital practices for orthopaedic injuries, previously identified as potentially of low value.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will search Medline, Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Epistemonikos to identify systematic reviews, randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs, cohort studies and case-control studies that evaluate selected practices according to a priori PICOS statements (Population-Intervention-Comparator-Outcome-Study design) . We will evaluate the methodological quality for systematic reviews using the Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews version 2 (AMSTAR-2). Risk of bias in original studies will be evaluated with the Cochrane revised tool for RCTs (RoB2) and with the risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. If for a given practice, more than two original studies on our primary outcome are identified, we will conduct meta-analysis using a random effects model and assess heterogeneity using the I index. We will assess credibility of evidence (I-IV) based on statistical significance, sample size, heterogeneity and bias as per published criteria.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval is not required as original data will not be collected. Knowledge users from three level I trauma centres are involved in the design and conduct of the study in accordance with an integrated knowledge translation approach. Findings related to the rapid review will be available in May 2020. They will be presented to key stakeholders to inform discussions and raise awareness on low-value injury care. In addition, results will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal, at national and international scientific meetings and to healthcare associations.

摘要

简介

矫形损伤几乎影响了 90%的创伤患者。先前的范围界定审查和专家咨询调查确定了成人矫形创伤人群中 15 种潜在的低价值院内实践。限制此类实践的频率可以减少不良事件,改善临床结局并释放资源。本研究旨在综合评估先前确定为潜在低价值的矫形损伤院内实践的证据。

方法和分析

我们将检索 Medline、Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE)、Cochrane 中央对照试验注册库和 Epistemonikos,以确定根据预先制定的 PICOS 陈述(人群-干预-对照-结局-研究设计)评估选定实践的系统评价、随机对照试验 (RCT)、准 RCT、队列研究和病例对照研究。我们将使用评估系统评价的测量工具版本 2 (AMSTAR-2) 评估系统评价的方法学质量。我们将使用 Cochrane RCT 修订工具 (RoB2) 和干预非随机研究的偏倚工具 (ROBINS-I) 评估原始研究的偏倚风险。如果对于给定的实践,我们确定了超过两项关于我们主要结局的原始研究,我们将使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,并使用 I 指数评估异质性。我们将根据发表的标准,基于统计学意义、样本量、异质性和偏倚来评估证据的可信度 (I-IV)。

伦理和传播

由于不会收集原始数据,因此不需要伦理批准。根据综合知识转化方法,来自三个一级创伤中心的知识使用者参与了研究的设计和实施。与快速审查相关的发现将于 2020 年 5 月公布。这些发现将提供给主要利益相关者,以讨论和提高对低价值损伤护理的认识。此外,研究结果将在同行评议期刊、国家和国际科学会议以及医疗保健协会上发表。

相似文献

3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

本文引用的文献

2
2017 Update on Medical Overuse: A Systematic Review.2017 年医疗过度诊治的更新:系统综述。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Jan 1;178(1):110-115. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.4361.
5
Evidence for overuse of medical services around the world.世界各地医疗服务过度使用的证据。
Lancet. 2017 Jul 8;390(10090):156-168. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32585-5. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
6
Addressing overuse and underuse around the world.应对全球范围内的过度使用和使用不足问题。
Lancet. 2017 Jul 8;390(10090):105-107. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32573-9. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
7
Avoiding overuse-the next quality frontier.避免过度使用——下一个质量前沿。
Lancet. 2017 Jul 8;390(10090):102-104. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32570-3. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
10
A scoping review of rapid review methods.快速综述方法的范围综述
BMC Med. 2015 Sep 16;13:224. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0465-6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验