Calais G, Garand G, Beutter P, Le Floch O
Clinique d'oncologie et radiothérapie, Hôpital Bretonneau, CHR-Tours, France.
Bull Cancer. 1988;75(10):971-8.
Induction chemotherapy in oropharynx carcinomas had demonstrated overall response rates of 80%, but no overall survival benefit have been reported. In order to determine the value of induction chemotherapy for these patients, we conducted a retrospective study: 86 patients were treated with chemotherapy (CT) and RT (group 1) and 52 patients were treated by radiotherapy (RT) alone (group 2). All patients had T3 or T4 tumors. CT used was cisplatinum based associated with bleomycin and vincristine or vindesine and actually with 5 fluoro-uracil. Objective response to the CT was observed for 34% patients. Five years actuarial survival rate was 18% for group 1 and 17% for group 2. Patterns of failure were identical in the 2 groups. A difference was observed only for patients with N3 nodes (24% 5 years survival rate in group 1 versus 6% in group 2) (P = 0.05). According to the histologic differentiation, the tumor site or the type of CT, no difference was observed. We concluded that this study failed to demonstrate an advantage for induction chemotherapy in advanced oropharynx carcinoma excepted for patients with N3 nodes.
口咽癌的诱导化疗总体缓解率已达80%,但尚未有总生存获益的报道。为了确定诱导化疗对这些患者的价值,我们进行了一项回顾性研究:86例患者接受化疗(CT)联合放疗(第1组),52例患者仅接受放疗(RT)(第2组)。所有患者均患有T3或T4肿瘤。所用的CT是以顺铂为基础,联合博来霉素和长春新碱或长春地辛,实际上现在联合5-氟尿嘧啶。34%的患者观察到对CT的客观反应。第1组的5年精算生存率为18%,第2组为17%。两组的失败模式相同。仅在有N3淋巴结转移的患者中观察到差异(第1组5年生存率为24%,第2组为6%)(P = 0.05)。根据组织学分化、肿瘤部位或CT类型,未观察到差异。我们得出结论,本研究未能证明诱导化疗对晚期口咽癌有优势,N3淋巴结转移患者除外。