Kliman David, Nivison-Smith Ian, Gottlieb David, Hamad Nada, Kerridge Ian, Purtill Duncan, Szer Jeff, Ma David
Malignant Haematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Service, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Australasian Bone Marrow Transplant Recipient Registry, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2020 Sep;26(9):1711-1718. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.03.005. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
The health and outcomes of long-term survivors after hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) are areas of evolving interest as short-term transplant outcomes improve. Because recent changes in transplant practice have likely changed the survivor population, we sought to assess the survival of a contemporary cohort of patients who were alive and free of disease 2 years after HCT. Data were extracted from first transplants documented between 2002 and 2011 in the Australasian Bone Marrow Transplant Recipient Registry on patients who received an allogeneic HCT for acute myeloid leukemia (AML), acute lymphoblastic leukemia, chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and myelodysplastic syndromes or an autologous HCT for myeloma or lymphoma. Patients were included if they had survived at least 2 years without disease relapse or progression. Mortality rates were compared with standard Australian and New Zealand populations using relative-survival analysis. A total of 1562 allogeneic and 3822 autologous HCT patients were included, with a median follow-up of 5.6 years. Compared with a matched group of patients from our previous study from 1992 to 2001, the contemporary cohort of allogeneic HCT recipients was older and more likely to receive peripheral blood stem cells and from unrelated donors. Allogeneic HCT for AML increased, wheresa transplants for CML fell from 32% to 8%. Increasing use of reduced-intensity conditioning and unrelated donors was also seen. Long-term survival after allogeneic and autologous HCT were very similar to the previous 1992 to 2001 cohort despite changes in practice over time. Recipients of autologous HCT for myeloma demonstrated substantially lower overall survival than HCT for other indications with no clear plateau. Annual relative survival for survivors of allogeneic HCT was 96% to 99% of the general population but only 89% to 96% of the general population for recipients of autologous HCT. Late deaths were primarily due to nonrelapse causes after allogeneic HCT, but relapse or disease progression remained prominent for recipients of autologous HCT, particularly for myeloma. The management of late HCT effects is important to improve long-term survival of transplant recipients but should be tailored to the risks specific to the primary disease and transplant type. Future planning should account for the impact of the expected increase in transplant activity and number of survivors on resource utilization.
随着造血细胞移植(HCT)短期疗效的改善,长期存活者的健康状况和预后成为了人们日益关注的领域。由于近期移植实践的变化可能改变了存活者群体,我们试图评估一组当代HCT患者在移植后2年仍存活且无疾病的生存率。数据取自2002年至2011年澳大利亚和新西兰骨髓移植受者登记处记录的首次移植,这些患者接受了异基因HCT治疗急性髓系白血病(AML)、急性淋巴细胞白血病、慢性髓系白血病(CML)、非霍奇金淋巴瘤和骨髓增生异常综合征,或接受了自体HCT治疗骨髓瘤或淋巴瘤。如果患者存活至少2年且无疾病复发或进展,则纳入研究。使用相对生存分析将死亡率与澳大利亚和新西兰的标准人群进行比较。共纳入1562例异基因HCT患者和3822例自体HCT患者,中位随访时间为5.6年。与我们1992年至2001年的上一项研究中的匹配患者组相比,当代异基因HCT受者队列年龄更大,更有可能接受外周血干细胞移植且供者为无关供者。AML的异基因HCT增加,而CML的移植从32%降至8%。还观察到减低强度预处理和无关供者的使用增加。尽管随着时间推移实践发生了变化,但异基因和自体HCT后的长期生存与1992年至2001年的前一队列非常相似。接受自体HCT治疗骨髓瘤的患者总体生存率显著低于其他适应证的HCT,且无明显平台期。异基因HCT存活者的年度相对生存率为普通人群的96%至99%,但自体HCT受者仅为普通人群的89%至96%。异基因HCT后的晚期死亡主要归因于非复发原因,但自体HCT受者的复发或疾病进展仍然突出,尤其是骨髓瘤患者。管理HCT晚期效应对于提高移植受者的长期生存很重要,但应根据原发性疾病和移植类型的特定风险进行调整。未来规划应考虑到预期的移植活动增加和存活者数量对资源利用的影响。