Malagón-Amor Ángeles, Martín-López Luis Miguel, Córcoles David, González Anna, Bellsolà Magda, Teo Alan R, Bulbena Antoni, Pérez Víctor, Bergé Daniel
Institut de Neuropsiquiatria i Addiccions (INAD), Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Department of Psychiatry and Forensic Medicine, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Mar 2;11:138. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00138. eCollection 2020.
Family may play an important role in the origin, maintenance, and treatment of people with social withdrawal. The aim of this study is to analyze family factors related to social withdrawal syndrome. Socio-demographic, clinical, and family data, including family psychiatric history, dysfunctional family dynamics, and history of family abuse were analyzed in 190 cases of social withdrawal with a minimum duration of 6 months that started an at-home treatment program. Data were analyzed at baseline and at 12 months. In 36 cases (18%) neither the patient nor the family allowed at home evaluation and treatment by the Crisis Resolution Home Treatment (CRHT) team. Patients had high rates of dysfunctional family dynamics ( = 115, 61.5%), and family psychiatric history ( = 113, 59.3%), especially maternal affective ( = 22, 42.9%), and anxiety disorders ( = 11 20.4%). There was a non-negligible percentage of family maltreatment in childhood ( = 35, 20.7%) and single-parent families ( = 66, 37.8%). Most of the cases lived with their families ( = 135, 86%), had higher family collaboration in the therapeutic plan ( = 97, 51.9%) and families were the ones to detect patient isolation and call for help ( = 140, 73.7%). Higher social withdrawal severity (as defined by at least one of: early age of onset, no family collaboration, lack of insight, higher CGSI score, and higher Zarit score), was associated with family psychiatric history, dysfunctional family dynamics, and family abuse history. All of these predictive variables were highly correlated one to each other. There is a high frequency of family psychiatric history, dysfunctional family dynamics, and traumatic events in childhood (family maltreatment), and these factors are closely interrelated, highlighting the potential role of family in the development and maintenance of social withdrawal.
家庭可能在社交退缩者的发病、维持现状及治疗过程中发挥重要作用。本研究旨在分析与社交退缩综合征相关的家庭因素。对190例社交退缩患者进行了社会人口学、临床及家庭数据的分析,这些患者在家接受治疗方案,社交退缩症状持续至少6个月。分析的数据包括家庭精神病史、功能失调的家庭动态以及家庭虐待史。在基线期和12个月时对数据进行分析。36例(18%)患者及其家庭均不允许危机解决家庭治疗(CRHT)团队进行家庭评估和治疗。患者功能失调的家庭动态发生率较高(n = 115,61.5%),家庭精神病史发生率较高(n = 113,59.3%),尤其是母亲的情感障碍(n = 22,42.9%)和焦虑症(n = 11,20.4%)。童年时期遭受家庭虐待的比例不可忽视(n = 35,20.7%),单亲家庭的比例也较高(n = 66,37.8%)。大多数患者与家人同住(n = 135,86%),在治疗方案中家庭协作度较高(n = 97,51.9%),并且是家人发现患者孤立并寻求帮助(n = 140,73.7%)。社交退缩严重程度较高(由以下至少一项定义:发病年龄早、缺乏家庭协作、缺乏洞察力、CGSI评分较高以及Zarit评分较高)与家庭精神病史、功能失调的家庭动态以及家庭虐待史相关。所有这些预测变量之间高度相关。家庭精神病史、功能失调的家庭动态以及童年创伤事件(家庭虐待)的发生率很高,且这些因素密切相关,凸显了家庭在社交退缩的发展和维持过程中的潜在作用。