Nazarov Anthony, Fikretoglu Deniz, Liu Aihua, Richardson J Don, Thompson Megan
The MacDonald Franklin OSI Research Centre, Lawson Health ResearchInstitute, London, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Psychiatry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2020 Mar 3;11(1):1729032. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2020.1729032. eCollection 2020.
: Potentially morally injurious experiences (PMIE) (events that transgress an individual's subjective moral standards) have been associated with psychologically distressing moral emotions such as shame and guilt. Military leaders and clinicians have feared that those with PMIEs may be less likely to seek help due to the withdrawing nature of shame/guilt; however, to date, help-seeking patterns of military personnel with PMIEs has not been explored. Our objective is to address this research gap. : Data from a nationally-representative mental health survey of active Canadian military personnel were analysed. To assess the association between exposure to three PMIEs and past-year help-seeking across different provider categories (i.e. professionals, para-professionals (those delegated with mental health advisory tasks but are not licenced to practice as medical professionals), non-professionals), a series of logistic regressions were conducted, controlling for exposure to other deployment and non-deployment-related psychological trauma, psychiatric variables, military factors, and sociodemographic variables. Analytical data frame included only personnel with a history of Afghanistan deployment (N = 4854). : Deployed members exposed to PMIEs were more likely to seek help from their family doctor/general practitioner (OR = 1.72; 95%CI = 1.25-2.36), paraprofessionals (OR = 1.72; 95%CI = 1.25-2.36), and non-professionals (OR = 1.44; 95%CI = 1.06-1.95) in comparison to members not exposed to PMIEs. Those exposed to PMIEs were also more likely to seek professional care from the civilian health care system (OR = 1.94; 95%CI = 1.27-2.96). : Contrary to long-held, but untested, assumptions regarding the impact of PMIEs on help-seeking, we found those with PMIEs are more likely to seek help from gatekeeper professionals (i.e. general practitioners), para-professionals, and non-professionals rather than specialized mental health professionals (e.g. psychologists). Increased utilization of civilian professionals raises concerns that active military members may be avoiding military health services. Clinically, this highlights the need to increase awareness of moral injury to ensure that actively serving military members are provided with appropriate advice and treatment.
潜在的道德伤害经历(PMIE)(违背个人主观道德标准的事件)与诸如羞耻和内疚等令人痛苦的道德情绪有关。军事领导人和临床医生担心,有PMIE经历的人可能因羞耻/内疚的退缩性质而不太可能寻求帮助;然而,迄今为止,有PMIE经历的军事人员的求助模式尚未得到探索。我们的目标是填补这一研究空白。:对来自加拿大现役军事人员全国代表性心理健康调查的数据进行了分析。为了评估接触三种PMIE与过去一年中不同提供者类别(即专业人员、辅助专业人员(被委托承担心理健康咨询任务但未获得医疗专业执业许可的人员)、非专业人员)的求助之间的关联,进行了一系列逻辑回归分析,同时控制了接触其他与部署和非部署相关的心理创伤、精神变量、军事因素和社会人口统计学变量。分析数据框架仅包括有阿富汗部署经历的人员(N = 4854)。:与未接触PMIE的人员相比,接触PMIE的部署人员更有可能向他们的家庭医生/全科医生(OR = 1.72;95%CI = 1.25 - 2.36)、辅助专业人员(OR = 1.72;95%CI = 1.25 - 2.36)和非专业人员(OR = 1.44;95%CI = 1.06 - 1.95)寻求帮助。接触PMIE的人员也更有可能向民用医疗保健系统寻求专业护理(OR = 1.94;95%CI = 1.27 - 2.96)。:与长期以来未经检验的关于PMIE对求助影响的假设相反,我们发现有PMIE经历的人更有可能向守门专业人员(即全科医生)、辅助专业人员和非专业人员寻求帮助,而不是向专门的心理健康专业人员(如心理学家)寻求帮助。民用专业人员利用率的增加引发了对现役军事人员可能避开军事医疗服务的担忧。在临床上,这突出了提高对道德伤害认识的必要性,以确保为现役军事人员提供适当的建议和治疗。