Department of Hypertension and Diabetology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk. Poland.
J Hypertens. 2020 Aug;38(8):1531-1540. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002416.
Pulse wave velocity (PWV) is a useful marker for determining subclinical vascular damage and patient risk stratification. Repeatability and reproducibility of PWV in relation to influencing factors have not yet been determined. This study examined the repeatability and reproducibility of PWV, and whether hemodynamics and sodium excretion impact on PWV in hypertensive patients remaining on stable medication.
Office blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), carotid--femoral PWV and central BP (SphygmoCor device), impedance cardiography (HOTMAN device) and 24-h urinary sodium excretion (UNa) were measured at baseline and after 4 weeks in 74 hypertensive patients (age 56.8 ± 11.5 years, mean ± SD). Two PWV measurements were performed at each visit.
Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) between the two PWV measurements were 0.981 (0.970--0.988) at baseline, 0.975 (0.960--0.984) after 4 weeks and 0.851 (0.773--0.903) between both visits. There were no significant changes in BP, HR, thoracic fluid content, stroke volume and UNa between visits. Despite excellent ICC, reproducibility of PWV was related to BP (P < 0.001) and HR (P = 0.07) changes between visits. Nineteen out of 74 patients had a difference in PWV greater than ±1 m/s between both visits.
In the medium-term observation, changes in BP and HR seem to affect PWV values. Our findings suggest that the assessment of PWV should be performed under stabilized BP and HR values, particularly in patients with newly diagnosed hypertension and/or low--moderate cardiovascular risk in whom the detection of asymptomatic hypertension-mediated organ damage impact on patient risk stratification.
脉搏波速度(PWV)是确定亚临床血管损伤和患者风险分层的有用标志物。PWV 与影响因素相关的重复性和再现性尚未确定。本研究检测了高血压患者在稳定药物治疗下 PWV 的重复性和再现性,以及血流动力学和钠排泄是否对 PWV 有影响。
在 74 例高血压患者(年龄 56.8±11.5 岁,均值±标准差)中,分别在基线和 4 周后测量诊室血压(BP)、心率(HR)、颈-股 PWV 和中心 BP( SphygmoCor 装置)、阻抗心动图(HOTMAN 装置)和 24 小时尿钠排泄(UNa)。每次就诊时均进行两次 PWV 测量。
两次 PWV 测量的组内相关系数(ICC)和 95%置信区间(95%CI)分别为基线时 0.981(0.9700.988),4 周后 0.975(0.9600.984),两次就诊间 0.851(0.773~0.903)。两次就诊间 BP、HR、胸腔液含量、每搏量和 UNa 无显著变化。尽管 ICC 良好,但 PWV 的再现性与就诊间 BP(P<0.001)和 HR(P=0.07)的变化有关。74 例患者中有 19 例两次就诊间 PWV 差值大于±1m/s。
在中期观察中,BP 和 HR 的变化似乎会影响 PWV 值。我们的研究结果表明,在检测无症状高血压介导的器官损伤对患者风险分层的影响时,应在血压和心率稳定的情况下进行 PWV 评估,特别是在新诊断为高血压和/或低-中度心血管风险的患者中。