Martin William C, Corliss Charles H
J Res Natl Bur Stand A Phys Chem. 1960 Nov-Dec;64A(6):443-479. doi: 10.6028/jres.064A.045. Epub 1960 Dec 1.
The I ii spectrum has been excited in electrodeless lamps and photographed from 655 A to 11084 A. Wavelengths and estimated intensities are given for almost 2,400 lines. A revision and extension of the earlier analyses of this spectrum has increased the number of known even levels from 43 to 124, and the number of odd levels from 55 to 190. New -factors are given for 46 levels, and the previous designations of 40 levels are changed. Improved measurements in the vacuum ultraviolet region give a correction of 7.4 cm to be subtracted from the values listed in , Vol. 3 (1958), for all levels above the ground configuration. The approximately 1,800 classified lines now include all of the strongest lines. The S of the ground configuration 5 5 has been found, and this configuration has been fitted to intermediate coupling theory. Magnetic dipole transitions between levels of the ground configuration, P-D (7282 A) and P-S (4460 A), have been observed and their nature confirmed by the Zeeman effect. The line 5 P-D shows hyperfine structure which is in approximate agreement with a theoretical calculation of the expected structure. New levels have been found for almost all higher configurations. All previously known series have been extended and new ones found. From one of the new series, , the principal ionization energy for I ii (154304 ±1 cm) has been derived. The results of the analysis are compared with theoretical expectations in a number of cases.
I ii光谱已在无极灯中激发,并拍摄了从655埃到11084埃的光谱。给出了近2400条谱线的波长和估计强度。对该光谱早期分析的修订和扩展,使已知的偶能级数量从43个增加到124个,奇能级数量从55个增加到190个。给出了46个能级的新的 -因子,并对40个能级的先前命名进行了更改。真空紫外区域的改进测量结果表明,对于基组态以上的所有能级,需要从《[具体文献名称]》第3卷(1958年)列出的值中减去7.4厘米的校正值。目前大约1800条已分类谱线包括了所有最强的谱线。已确定了基组态5 5 的S值,并将该组态拟合到中间耦合理论。已观察到基组态各能级之间的磁偶极跃迁,即P-D(7282埃)和P-S(4460埃),并通过塞曼效应证实了它们的性质。谱线5 P-D显示出超精细结构,这与预期结构的理论计算大致相符。几乎所有更高组态都发现了新的能级。所有先前已知的系列都得到了扩展,并发现了新的系列。从其中一个新系列 中,推导出了I ii的主电离能(154304±1厘米)。在许多情况下,将分析结果与理论预期进行了比较。