Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
AIDS Care. 2020 May;32(Suppl 2):214-227. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2020.1742870. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of treatment supporter interventions (TSI) in improving ART adherence and viral suppression among adults living with HIV (PLWH) in sub-Saharan Africa. This review included ten randomized controlled trials (RCT) and six cohort studies comparing treatment support interventions to the standard of care (SOC). Primary outcomes include pill count ART adherence and viral load suppression (VLS). Pooled relative risk ratios (PRR) with 95% confidence intervals were generated using random-effects models. Stratified analyses and meta-regressions were conducted to determine the effect of study type, follow-upperiod, and patient treatment supporters on ART adherence. Treatment supporters included partners, friends, family members, trained community health workers, and HIV positive peers. TSIs were associated with a 7.6% higher ART adherence compared to the SOC group (PRR = 1.076, [95% CI = 1.005, 1.151]). VLS was 5% higher in the treatment group compared to the SOC group (PRR = 1.05, [95% CI = 1.061, 1.207]). There was a significant, positive association between TSIs and VLS in community-based delivery settings but not in facility-based settings. TSIs were statistically significant for VLS in cohort study designs (RR = 1.073, [95% CI = 1.028, 1.121]) but not in RCTs. Findings suggest that TSIs critical in facilitating optimal ART adherence and VLS among PLWHs.
本系统评价和荟萃分析评估了治疗支持者干预(TSI)在提高撒哈拉以南非洲地区艾滋病毒感染者(PLWH)接受抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)的依从性和病毒抑制方面的有效性。本综述纳入了 10 项随机对照试验(RCT)和 6 项队列研究,将治疗支持干预与标准护理(SOC)进行了比较。主要结局包括药物计数 ART 依从性和病毒载量抑制(VLS)。使用随机效应模型生成具有 95%置信区间的汇总相对风险比(PRR)。进行分层分析和荟萃回归,以确定研究类型、随访期和患者治疗支持者对 ART 依从性的影响。治疗支持者包括伴侣、朋友、家庭成员、经过培训的社区卫生工作者和 HIV 阳性同伴。与 SOC 组相比,TSI 使 ART 依从性提高了 7.6%(PRR = 1.076,[95%CI = 1.005,1.151])。治疗组的病毒载量抑制率比 SOC 组高 5%(PRR = 1.05,[95%CI = 1.061,1.207])。在社区提供的治疗环境中,TSI 与病毒载量抑制率呈显著正相关,但在医疗机构提供的治疗环境中则没有。在队列研究设计中,TSI 对病毒载量抑制率有统计学意义(RR = 1.073,[95%CI = 1.028,1.121]),但在 RCT 中则没有。研究结果表明,TSI 在促进 PLWH 接受最佳 ART 依从性和病毒载量抑制率方面至关重要。