• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在颈椎前路椎体次全切除融合术治疗双节段脊髓型颈椎病中,使用可吸收螺钉与钢板固定的界面固定效果比较。

Interface Fixation Using Absorbable Screws versus Plate Fixation in Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion for Two-Level Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China (mainland).

Department of Orthopedics, Xi'an International Rehabilitation Medical Center, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China (mainland).

出版信息

Med Sci Monit. 2020 Mar 20;26:e921507. doi: 10.12659/MSM.921507.

DOI:10.12659/MSM.921507
PMID:32196483
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7106970/
Abstract

BACKGROUND We compared the clinical and radiographic outcomes between interface fixation using absorbable screws and plate fixation in anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) to evaluate the effectiveness of these 2 fixation methods for the treatment of 2-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). MATERIAL AND METHODS From January 2014 to December 2016, a total of 220 patients who received 2-level ACCF were retrospectively collected. Among them, 108 patients were treated with interface fixation using absorbable screws (Group A) and 112 patients underwent plate fixation (Group B). Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and Neck Disability Index (NDI) score were employed to compare the clinical improvement. Operative time, blood loss, surgical cost, cervical lordosis, complications, and fusion rate were also evaluated. RESULTS The average follow-up time were 35.2±4.5 months in Group A and 35.9±3.9 months in Group B. There was no difference in operative time and blood loss for both groups. The JOA scores and NDI scores were similar in each follow-up (p>0.05 in all). Group A cost an average of 30% less than Group B for the operation. Both groups achieved 100% in the fusion rate with the same conditions in cervical lordosis. Group A (5/108) had a significantly lower complication rate than Group B (17/112) (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS ACCF with interface fixation using absorbable screws achieved similar clinical outcomes compared to ACCF with plate fixation for 2-level CSM. Moreover, the interface fixation using absorbable screws presented far fewer complications and cost less for the operation.

摘要

背景

我们比较了在前路颈椎椎体次全切除融合术(ACCF)中使用可吸收螺钉和钢板固定界面的临床和影像学结果,以评估这两种固定方法治疗 2 级脊髓型颈椎病(CSM)的效果。

材料和方法

回顾性收集了 2014 年 1 月至 2016 年 12 月接受 2 级 ACCF 的 220 例患者。其中 108 例采用可吸收螺钉界面固定(A 组),112 例采用钢板固定(B 组)。采用日本矫形协会(JOA)评分和颈部残疾指数(NDI)评分比较临床疗效。评估手术时间、出血量、手术费用、颈椎前凸、并发症和融合率。

结果

A 组平均随访时间为 35.2±4.5 个月,B 组为 35.9±3.9 个月。两组手术时间和出血量无差异。每组在每次随访时的 JOA 评分和 NDI 评分均相似(p>0.05)。A 组的手术费用平均比 B 组低 30%。两组在颈椎前凸方面均达到 100%的融合率,且条件相同。A 组(5/108)的并发症发生率明显低于 B 组(17/112)(p<0.05)。

结论

在治疗 2 级 CSM 方面,使用可吸收螺钉的界面固定与使用钢板的 ACCF 具有相似的临床效果。此外,使用可吸收螺钉的界面固定术并发症更少,手术费用更低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7673/7106970/5de651921996/medscimonit-26-e921507-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7673/7106970/5de651921996/medscimonit-26-e921507-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7673/7106970/5de651921996/medscimonit-26-e921507-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Interface Fixation Using Absorbable Screws versus Plate Fixation in Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion for Two-Level Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.在颈椎前路椎体次全切除融合术治疗双节段脊髓型颈椎病中,使用可吸收螺钉与钢板固定的界面固定效果比较。
Med Sci Monit. 2020 Mar 20;26:e921507. doi: 10.12659/MSM.921507.
2
Two-level anterior cervical discectomy versus one-level corpectomy in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.双节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除术与单节段椎体次全切除术治疗脊髓型颈椎病的对比
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Apr 1;34(7):692-6. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318199690a.
3
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with stand-alone anchored cages versus posterior laminectomy and fusion for four-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a retrospective study with 2-year follow-up.前路颈椎间盘切除及独立锚定椎间融合器融合术与后路椎板切除术及融合术治疗四节段脊髓型颈椎病的回顾性研究:两年随访
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Jul 12;19(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2136-1.
4
Two-level corpectomy versus three-level discectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a comparison of perioperative, radiographic, and clinical outcomes.颈椎脊髓病的两级椎体次全切除术与三级椎间盘切除术:围手术期、影像学及临床结果比较
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Sep;23(3):280-9. doi: 10.3171/2014.12.SPINE14545. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
5
A comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and corpectomy in patients with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy.多节段脊髓型颈椎病患者前路颈椎间盘切除术与椎体切除术的比较。
Eur Spine J. 2012 Mar;21(3):474-81. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1961-9. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
6
Comparative analysis of clinical outcomes between zero-profile implant and cages with plate fixation in treating multilevel cervical spondilotic myelopathy: A three-year follow-up.零切迹椎间融合器与带钢板固定的椎间融合器治疗多节段脊髓型颈椎病的临床疗效比较分析:三年随访
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2016 May;144:72-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.03.010. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
7
A comparative effectiveness study of patient-rated and radiographic outcome after 2 types of decompression with fusion for spondylotic myelopathy: anterior cervical discectomy versus corpectomy.两种减压融合术治疗脊髓型颈椎病的患者自评和影像学疗效比较研究:前路颈椎间盘切除与椎体次全切除。
Neurosurg Focus. 2013 Jul;35(1):E4. doi: 10.3171/2013.3.FOCUS1396.
8
A Comparison of Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion Combined With Artificial Disc Replacement and Cage Fusion in Patients With Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.多节段脊髓型颈椎病患者前路颈椎椎体次全切除融合术与人工椎间盘置换及椎间融合器融合术的比较
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Aug 15;40(16):1277-83. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000957.
9
Can Self-Locking Cages Offer the Same Clinical Outcomes as Anterior Cage-with-Plate Fixation for 3-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) in Mid-Term Follow-Up?自锁 Cage 是否能在中期随访中获得与前路 Cage-钢板固定相同的临床效果?用于治疗三节段前路颈椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)
Med Sci Monit. 2019 Jan 19;25:547-557. doi: 10.12659/MSM.911234.
10
Analysis of Cervical Sagittal Balance in Treating Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: 1-Level Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion Versus 2-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.分析治疗颈椎病脊髓病的颈椎矢状平衡:1 级前路颈椎椎体切除术和融合术与 2 级前路颈椎间盘切除术和融合术。
Med Sci Monit. 2020 Jul 29;26:e923748. doi: 10.12659/MSM.923748.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk factors of early subsidence of 3D-printed artificial vertebral body following single-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF): retrospective study of 98 patients.单节段颈椎前路椎体次全切除融合术(ACCF)后3D打印人工椎体早期下沉的危险因素:98例患者的回顾性研究
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jul 9;20(1):633. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06056-9.
2
Safety and Feasibility of Internal Fixation Using Bioabsorbable Versus Titanium Materials for Short-Level Lamina Reimplantation: A Comparative Clinical Study.用于短节段椎板再植入的生物可吸收材料与钛材料内固定的安全性和可行性:一项对比临床研究
Orthop Surg. 2025 Jan;17(1):202-211. doi: 10.1111/os.14288. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Characterizing dysphagia after spinal surgery.描述脊髓手术后的吞咽困难。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2021 Sep;44(5):733-741. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2019.1665613. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
2
Comparison of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With a Stand-Alone Interbody Cage Versus a Conventional Cage-Plate Technique: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.前路颈椎间盘切除融合术:独立椎间融合器与传统椎间融合器钢板技术的比较:系统评价与Meta分析
Global Spine J. 2019 Jun;9(4):446-455. doi: 10.1177/2192568218774576. Epub 2018 May 17.
3
Anterior Techniques in Managing Cervical Disc Disease.
Anterior percutaneous full-endoscopic transcorporeal decompression of the spinal cord via one vertebra with two bony channels for adjacent two-segment cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a technical note.
经皮全内镜经椎板脊髓前方减压术治疗相邻两节段颈椎脊髓病:一种技术说明。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Oct 26;24(1):844. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06978-7.
4
Comparison of radiological and clinical outcomes of 3D-printed artificial vertebral body with Titanium mesh cage in single-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion: A meta-analysis.3D打印人工椎体与钛网笼在单节段颈椎前路椎体次全切除融合术中的影像学和临床结果比较:一项荟萃分析
Front Surg. 2023 Jan 11;9:1077551. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1077551. eCollection 2022.
5
Comparative Analysis of 3D-Printed Artificial Vertebral Body Versus Titanium Mesh Cage in Repairing Bone Defects Following Single-Level Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion.3D 打印人工椎体与钛网笼在单节段前路颈椎椎体次全切除融合术中修复骨缺损的对比分析。
Med Sci Monit. 2021 Feb 7;27:e928022. doi: 10.12659/MSM.928022.
颈椎间盘疾病的前路治疗技术
Cureus. 2018 Aug 14;10(8):e3146. doi: 10.7759/cureus.3146.
4
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is associated with greater tibial tunnel widening when using a bioabsorbable screw compared to an all-inside technique with suspensory fixation.前交叉韧带重建时,使用可吸收螺钉比全内技术伴悬吊固定时胫骨隧道增宽更大。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Aug;27(8):2577-2584. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5275-x. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
5
Comparison between absorbable pins and mini-screw fixations for the treatment of radial head fractures Mason type II-III.可吸收钢针与微型螺钉内固定治疗桡骨头骨折Mason II-III型的比较
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Mar 27;19(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2014-x.
6
A Comparison of Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Corpectomy in Patients With 4-level Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: a Minimum 2-year Follow-up Study: Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy.4节段脊髓型颈椎病患者多节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除术与椎体次全切除术的比较:至少2年的随访研究:多节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除术
Clin Spine Surg. 2017 Jun;30(5):E540-E546. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000212.
7
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion in multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: A meta-analysis.多节段脊髓型颈椎病行颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术与颈椎前路椎体次全切除融合术的Meta分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Dec;95(49):e5437. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005437.
8
Long-term clinical outcomes following 3- and 4-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.三阶段和四阶段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后的长期临床结果。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Jun;24(6):885-91. doi: 10.3171/2015.10.SPINE15795. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
9
Long-term follow-up of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with bioabsorbable plates and screws.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015 Sep;136:116-21. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.04.002. Epub 2015 Jun 9.
10
A comparative effectiveness study of patient-rated and radiographic outcome after 2 types of decompression with fusion for spondylotic myelopathy: anterior cervical discectomy versus corpectomy.两种减压融合术治疗脊髓型颈椎病的患者自评和影像学疗效比较研究:前路颈椎间盘切除与椎体次全切除。
Neurosurg Focus. 2013 Jul;35(1):E4. doi: 10.3171/2013.3.FOCUS1396.