Suppr超能文献

使用琼脂稀释法对厌氧菌进行抗生素敏感性测试:三种技术的比较

Antibiotic susceptibility testing of anaerobic organisms using the agar dilution method: comparison of three techniques.

作者信息

Wexler H M, Reeves D, Finegold S M

机构信息

Research Service, Veterans Administration Wadsworth Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 1988;10(6):747-60.

PMID:3219688
Abstract

Three currently used anaerobic susceptibility testing methods were compared: (1) the technique used at the Wadsworth Microbial Diseases Research Laboratory, (2) the technique listed as the reference standard by the National Committee on Clinical Laboratory Standards, and (3) the technique used at the Tufts New England Medical Center. Four-hundred-seventy anaerobic microorganisms, isolated from clinical specimens, were tested against cefoxitin, cefotetan, ceftizoxime, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, imipenem, and clindamycin. Significant differences were noted in mean inhibitory concentrations and percent susceptible at breakpoint among the three techniques used and varied with the antimicrobial agent and species tested.

摘要

对目前使用的三种厌氧药敏试验方法进行了比较

(1)沃兹沃思微生物疾病研究实验室使用的技术;(2)被临床实验室标准委员会列为参考标准的技术;(3)塔夫茨新英格兰医疗中心使用的技术。从临床标本中分离出的470株厌氧微生物,针对头孢西丁、头孢替坦、头孢唑肟、头孢噻肟、头孢他啶、亚胺培南和克林霉素进行了测试。在所使用的三种技术之间,平均抑菌浓度和折点处的敏感百分比存在显著差异,并且随所测试的抗菌药物和菌种而变化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验