Suppr超能文献

使用琼脂稀释法对厌氧菌进行抗生素敏感性测试:三种技术的比较

Antibiotic susceptibility testing of anaerobic organisms using the agar dilution method: comparison of three techniques.

作者信息

Wexler H M, Reeves D, Finegold S M

机构信息

Research Service, Veterans Administration Wadsworth Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 1988;10(6):747-60.

PMID:3219688
Abstract

Three currently used anaerobic susceptibility testing methods were compared: (1) the technique used at the Wadsworth Microbial Diseases Research Laboratory, (2) the technique listed as the reference standard by the National Committee on Clinical Laboratory Standards, and (3) the technique used at the Tufts New England Medical Center. Four-hundred-seventy anaerobic microorganisms, isolated from clinical specimens, were tested against cefoxitin, cefotetan, ceftizoxime, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, imipenem, and clindamycin. Significant differences were noted in mean inhibitory concentrations and percent susceptible at breakpoint among the three techniques used and varied with the antimicrobial agent and species tested.

摘要

对目前使用的三种厌氧药敏试验方法进行了比较

(1)沃兹沃思微生物疾病研究实验室使用的技术;(2)被临床实验室标准委员会列为参考标准的技术;(3)塔夫茨新英格兰医疗中心使用的技术。从临床标本中分离出的470株厌氧微生物,针对头孢西丁、头孢替坦、头孢唑肟、头孢噻肟、头孢他啶、亚胺培南和克林霉素进行了测试。在所使用的三种技术之间,平均抑菌浓度和折点处的敏感百分比存在显著差异,并且随所测试的抗菌药物和菌种而变化。

相似文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验