Assistant Professor, Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University, Ankara, Turkey.
Professor, Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey; Professor, OMFS IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging & Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leuven and Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2020 Aug;130(2):209-216. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2020.02.005. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
The aim of this study was to assess the effect of a metal artifact reduction (MAR) algorithm and the adaptive image noise optimizer (AINO) optimization filter in the detection of peri-implant dehiscences with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Nine implants (3 zirconium, 3 titanium, and 3 zirconium-titanium) were placed in 3 sheep heads. Dehiscences were created on the buccal and lingual/palatal surfaces. A total of 9 defects and 9 controls with no defects were evaluated by 3 observers. Each sheep head was scanned 5 times with 4 scan modes; (1) without MAR/without AINO; (2) with MAR/without AINO; (3) without MAR/with AINO; and (4) with MAR/with AINO. Receiver operating characteristic analysis and weighted kappa coefficients were used to calculate diagnostic efficacy and intra- and interobserver agreements for each implant type and scan mode.
For all implant types, dehiscences were most accurately detected when both MAR and AINO were applied (P ≤ .045). Detection of dehiscences was more accurate with titanium implants (P ≤ .040). There were no significant differences in agreement among and between the observers.
The use of both MAR and AINO enhanced the detection accuracy of artificially created dehiscences in proximity to implants. Their combined use is recommended for detecting peri-implant dehiscences.
本研究旨在评估金属伪影降低(MAR)算法和自适应图像噪声优化(AINO)优化滤波器在锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)中检测种植体周围骨缺损中的效果。
将 9 个种植体(3 个氧化锆、3 个钛和 3 个氧化锆钛)植入 3 个羊头。在颊侧和舌侧/腭侧表面制造骨缺损。由 3 名观察者评估总共 9 个缺损和 9 个无缺损对照。每个羊头用 4 种扫描模式扫描 5 次;(1)无 MAR/无 AINO;(2)有 MAR/无 AINO;(3)无 MAR/有 AINO;(4)有 MAR/有 AINO。使用受试者工作特征分析和加权 kappa 系数计算每种种植体类型和扫描模式的诊断效能和观察者内和观察者间的一致性。
对于所有种植体类型,当同时应用 MAR 和 AINO 时,骨缺损的检测最准确(P≤.045)。钛种植体的检测更准确(P≤.040)。观察者之间和之间的一致性没有显著差异。
同时使用 MAR 和 AINO 提高了在接近种植体的位置人工制造的骨缺损的检测准确性。建议联合使用这两种方法来检测种植体周围骨缺损。