Department of Oral Pathology and Radiology, Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Department of Radiology, Päijät-Häme Central Hospital, Lahti, Finland.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2023 Nov;52(8):20230252. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20230252. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
Three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging can be considered, especially in patients with complicated peri-implantitis (PI). Artifacts induced by dense materials are the drawback of CBCT imaging and the peri-implant bone condition may not be assessed reliably because the artifacts are present in the same area. This pilot study investigates the performance of the artifact reduction algorithm (ARA) of the Planmeca Viso G7 CBCT device (Planmeca, Helsinki, Finland) with three different implant materials and imaging parameters.
Three pairs of dental implants consisting of titanium, zirconia, and fiber reinforced composite (FRC) were set into a pig mandible. A vertical defect simulating peri-implantitis bone loss was made on the buccal side of one of each implant. The defect was identified and measured by two observers and compared to the actual dimensions. In addition, the bone structure and the marginal cortex visibility between the implants were estimated visually.
The bone defect and its dimensions with the zirconia implant could not be identified in any image with or without the metal artifact reduction algorithm. The bone defect of titanium and FRC implants were identified with all three imaging parameters or even without ARA. The interobserver agreement between the two observers was almost perfect for all categories analyzed.
Peri-implantitis defect of the zirconia implant and the peri-implant bone structure of the zirconia implants cannot be recognized reliably with any ARA levels, or any imaging parameters used with the Planmeca Viso G7. The need for ARA when imaging the peri-implant bone condition of the titanium and FRC implants may be unnecessary.
三维锥形束 CT(CBCT)成像可以被考虑,特别是在复杂的种植体周围炎(PI)患者中。高密度材料引起的伪影是 CBCT 成像的一个缺点,因为伪影出现在同一区域,因此种植体周围骨的情况可能无法可靠评估。本初步研究调查了 Planmeca Viso G7 CBCT 设备(芬兰赫尔辛基的 Planmeca)的去伪影算法(ARA)在三种不同种植体材料和成像参数下的性能。
将三对由钛、氧化锆和纤维增强复合材料(FRC)组成的牙科种植体植入猪下颌骨中。在每个种植体的颊侧制造一个模拟种植体周围炎骨丢失的垂直缺损。由两名观察者识别和测量缺损,并与实际尺寸进行比较。此外,还通过肉眼观察评估了种植体之间的骨结构和边缘皮质可见度。
带有氧化锆种植体的骨缺损及其尺寸在任何有或没有金属伪影减少算法的图像中都无法识别。钛和 FRC 种植体的骨缺损在所有三种成像参数下,甚至在没有 ARA 的情况下,都可以被识别。两名观察者之间的观察者间一致性在所有分析类别中几乎都是完美的。
任何 ARA 水平或 Planmeca Viso G7 中使用的任何成像参数都无法可靠识别氧化锆种植体的种植体周围炎缺损和氧化锆种植体的种植体周围骨结构。对于钛和 FRC 种植体的种植体周围骨情况成像,可能不需要 ARA。