• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较 2012-2016 年冰岛接受第一孕期联合筛查的冰岛女性中假阳性和真阴性结果的产前筛查经历。

Comparing prenatal screening experiences of Icelandic women who received false-positive and true-negative first-trimester combined screening results in Iceland in 2012-2016.

机构信息

Department of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland.

Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

J Genet Couns. 2020 Aug;29(4):644-657. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1269. Epub 2020 Mar 21.

DOI:10.1002/jgc4.1269
PMID:32198907
Abstract

First-trimester combined screening (FTS) has been offered to all pregnant women in Iceland since 2003. Individuals with high-risk FTS results are offered an invasive test option with a ≤1% risk of fetal loss. This study gives insight into the prenatal screening and diagnosis experiences and preferences of 101 women who underwent FTS in Iceland in the years 2012-2016, comparing the experience of those who received false-positive FTS results to those who received true-negative results. Retrospective patient-reported anxiety levels at the time of receiving FTS results were significantly higher in those who received false-positive results compared to those who received true-negative results. For a subset of these participants, the anxiety lasted through pregnancy, and for a smaller subset, it lasted even longer. Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is currently not offered in Iceland, aside from the rare exceptional case. Given the extremely low false-positive rates of NIPT, we believe NIPT is worth considering as Iceland's standard first-tier screening method for trisomy 13, 18, and 21. We believe the findings of this study are beneficial not only for Iceland but also for other countries where FTS is the first-tier prenatal screening method or the only offered test. Additionally, only 21% of participants in our study reported that they had heard of NIPT, which emphasizes the need for comprehensive NIPT pretest information to be available prior to its uptake to ensure informed and autonomous decision-making.

摘要

自 2003 年以来,冰岛所有孕妇都可以接受早期联合筛查(FTS)。对于 FTS 结果高风险的个体,提供了一种侵袭性测试选择,胎儿丢失的风险≤1%。本研究深入了解了 2012 年至 2016 年期间在冰岛接受 FTS 的 101 名女性的产前筛查和诊断经验和偏好,将接受假阳性 FTS 结果的个体的经验与接受真实阴性结果的个体进行了比较。在接受 FTS 结果时,与接受真实阴性结果的个体相比,接受假阳性结果的个体的焦虑水平明显更高。对于这些参与者中的一部分,焦虑持续到整个孕期,对于更小的一部分,焦虑甚至持续更长时间。除了极少数特殊情况外,冰岛目前不提供非侵入性产前检测(NIPT)。鉴于 NIPT 的假阳性率极低,我们认为 NIPT 值得考虑作为冰岛针对三体 13、18 和 21 的标准一线筛查方法。我们认为本研究的结果不仅对冰岛,而且对其他将 FTS 作为一线产前筛查方法或唯一提供的测试的国家都有益。此外,我们研究中只有 21%的参与者报告说他们听说过 NIPT,这强调了在采用 NIPT 之前需要提供全面的 NIPT 检测前信息,以确保知情和自主决策。

相似文献

1
Comparing prenatal screening experiences of Icelandic women who received false-positive and true-negative first-trimester combined screening results in Iceland in 2012-2016.比较 2012-2016 年冰岛接受第一孕期联合筛查的冰岛女性中假阳性和真阴性结果的产前筛查经历。
J Genet Couns. 2020 Aug;29(4):644-657. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1269. Epub 2020 Mar 21.
2
Prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidies with cell-free DNA in the general pregnancy population: a cost-effectiveness analysis.一般妊娠人群中使用游离DNA进行胎儿非整倍体的产前筛查:一项成本效益分析。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(7):1160-4. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1038703. Epub 2015 May 22.
3
Implementing non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in the Netherlands: An interview study exploring opinions about and experiences with societal pressure, reimbursement, and an expanding scope.在荷兰实施非侵入性产前检测(NIPT):一项访谈研究,探讨关于社会压力、报销及检测范围扩大的观点和经历。
J Genet Couns. 2020 Feb;29(1):112-121. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1188. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
4
Screening for chromosomal abnormalities by first trimester combined screening and noninvasive prenatal testing.孕早期联合筛查和无创产前检测用于染色体异常筛查。
Ultraschall Med. 2015 Feb;36(1):40-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1385059. Epub 2014 Sep 25.
5
The potential impact of NIPT as a second-tier screen on the outcomes of high-risk pregnancies with rare chromosomal abnormalities.作为二级筛查手段的无创产前检测(NIPT)对患有罕见染色体异常的高危妊娠结局的潜在影响。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015 Oct;55(5):420-6. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12385. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
6
Prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy in singleton pregnancies.单胎妊娠胎儿非整倍体的产前筛查。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011 Jul;33(7):736-750. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34961-1.
7
Prenatal screening in the era of non-invasive prenatal testing: a Nationwide cross-sectional survey of obstetrician knowledge, attitudes and clinical practice.无创产前检测时代的产前筛查:一项关于产科医生知识、态度和临床实践的全国性横断面调查。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Oct 1;20(1):579. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03279-y.
8
TRIDENT-2: National Implementation of Genome-wide Non-invasive Prenatal Testing as a First-Tier Screening Test in the Netherlands.TRIDENT-2:荷兰全国范围内实施全基因组非侵入性产前筛查作为一级筛查检测。
Am J Hum Genet. 2019 Dec 5;105(6):1091-1101. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.10.005. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
9
Obstetric professionals' perceptions of non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome: clinical usefulness compared with existing tests and ethical implications.产科专业人士对非侵入性产前唐氏综合征筛查的看法:与现有检测方法相比的临床效用及伦理影响。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Sep 5;17(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1474-6.
10
A new era in prenatal care: non-invasive prenatal testing in Switzerland.产前护理新纪元:瑞士的无创性产前检测。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2014 Feb 4;144:w13915. doi: 10.4414/smw.2014.13915.