Department of Psychological, Health, and Territorial Sciences, University of Chieti, Italy.
Department of Gastroenterology, Scientific Institute for Digestive Disease "Saverio de Bellis" Hospital, Castellana Grotte, Italy.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2020 May-Jun;64:56-62. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2020.03.004. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
The clinical management of high symptom severity is a challenging task with patients with functional somatic disorders. We investigated the extent to which DCPR-revised (DCPR-R) syndromes and the DSM-5 category of Somatic Symptom Disorder (SSD) were able to predict symptom severity in 203 consecutive tertiary care patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS).
Semistructured interview were used for assessing DCPR-R and validated scales for SSD (combining PHQ-12 and WI-7), severity of symptoms (IBS-SSS), psychological distress (HADS), and psychosocial functioning (SF-12).
Compared to moderate severity (IBS-SSS = 175-300), patients in the high range of severity (IBS-SSS > 300) had significantly more DCPR-R syndromes (particularly alexithymia and persistent somatization), higher psychological distress, and poorer psychosocial functioning, but showed no difference for SSD. DCPR-R, particularly alexithymia and persistent somatization, significantly and independently predicted IBS severity by explaining 18.5% of the IBS-SSS variance with large effect size (d = 1.18), after controlling for covariables. Conversely, SSD was not able to significantly predict IBS severity.
This study highlights the need of an integrative approach in the medical setting. Psychosomatic factors play a relevant role in the individual perception of symptom severity and should be carefully evaluated for clinical management of functional syndromes.
对于功能性躯体障碍患者,高症状严重程度的临床管理是一项具有挑战性的任务。我们研究了 DCPR 修订版(DCPR-R)综合征和躯体症状障碍(SSD)DSM-5 类别在多大程度上能够预测 203 例连续三级护理肠易激综合征(IBS)患者的症状严重程度。
采用半结构化访谈评估 DCPR-R 和 SSD 的验证量表(结合 PHQ-12 和 WI-7)、症状严重程度(IBS-SSS)、心理困扰(HADS)和心理社会功能(SF-12)。
与中度严重程度(IBS-SSS=175-300)相比,IBS-SSS>300 的严重程度高的患者具有更多的 DCPR-R 综合征(特别是情感表达障碍和持续躯体化)、更高的心理困扰和更差的心理社会功能,但 SSD 没有差异。在控制协变量后,DCPR-R,特别是情感表达障碍和持续躯体化,通过解释 IBS-SSS 方差的 18.5%,具有大效应量(d=1.18),可显著且独立地预测 IBS 严重程度。相反,SSD 不能显著预测 IBS 严重程度。
本研究强调了在医疗环境中需要综合方法。身心因素在个体对症状严重程度的感知中起重要作用,应在功能性综合征的临床管理中进行仔细评估。