Bell Morris D, Muppala Bharath, Weinstein Andrea J, Ciosek David, Pittman Brian, Petrakis Ismene, Fiszdon Joanna M
Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, United States of America.
Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, United States of America.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2020 May;112:17-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2020.01.018. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
In a previous report on a randomized clinical trial of a 3-month program of Cognitive Remediation Therapy (CRT) augmented by Work Therapy (WT) compared with WT alone for older veterans with substance use disorder (SUD), we reported significantly greater improvements at six-month follow-up on neurocognitive outcomes of working memory and executive functions for the CRT + WT condition. However, no difference was found between conditions on SUD outcomes, with both groups showing unusually high levels of abstinence. In this study, we extended follow-up to 12 months to test whether there was an SUD outcome "sleeper effect" from CRT + WT. To better understand the effects of WT, we added a treatment-as-usual (TAU) comparison sample.
Forty-eight veterans with SUD receiving standard outpatient VA care were randomized into CRT + WT or WT. Clinical Global Impression (CGI) ratings were performed on 43/48 participants with up-to-date medical records. A TAU comparison group (n = 44) with similar demographic and illness characteristics was added to the analysis.
Treatment groups did not differ significantly at 12 months on CGI (p = 0.27), with 77% receiving CRT + WT showing favorable SUD outcomes compared to 62% in WT. Both groups had better CGI outcomes (p < 0.01) compared to the TAU comparison group (27%). Hours of WT participation (r = -0.49, p = 0.001) and hours of CRT (r = -0.45, p = 0.048) were associated with better CGI scores.
While no sleeper effect was found for CRT, a robust effect was strongly supported for WT on SUD outcomes.
在之前一项关于认知康复治疗(CRT)联合工作疗法(WT)的3个月项目与单独使用WT治疗老年物质使用障碍(SUD)退伍军人的随机临床试验报告中,我们指出,在6个月随访时,CRT + WT组在工作记忆和执行功能的神经认知结果方面有显著更大的改善。然而,两组在SUD结果上没有差异,两组的戒酒率都异常高。在本研究中,我们将随访延长至12个月,以测试CRT + WT是否存在SUD结果“潜伏效应”。为了更好地理解WT的效果,我们增加了一个常规治疗(TAU)对照样本。
48名接受退伍军人事务部(VA)标准门诊护理的SUD退伍军人被随机分为CRT + WT组或WT组。对43/48名有最新病历的参与者进行了临床总体印象(CGI)评分。分析中增加了一个具有相似人口统计学和疾病特征的TAU对照组(n = 44)。
治疗组在12个月时的CGI评分无显著差异(p = 0.27),接受CRT + WT治疗的患者中有77%显示出良好的SUD结果,而WT组为62%。与TAU对照组(27%)相比,两组的CGI结果均更好(p < 0.01)。WT参与时长(r = -0.49,p = 0.001)和CRT时长(r = -0.45,p = 0.048)与更好的CGI评分相关。
虽然未发现CRT有潜伏效应,但有力支持了WT对SUD结果有显著效果。