驾驶员生态眩光测试的验证。
Validation of the driver ecological glare test.
机构信息
Streetlab, Institut de la Vision, Paris, France.
Valeo Lighting Systems, Bobigny, France.
出版信息
J Safety Res. 2020 Feb;72:139-143. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2019.12.007. Epub 2019 Dec 31.
INTRODUCTION
The present study proposes to validate the Driver Ecological Glare Test (DEGT), a test developed to measure the benefit of a headlight glare Advanced Driver Assistance System (ADAS), by comparing it to a laboratory glare test.
METHOD
Twenty-four participants, aged from 55 to 70 years, were recruited to complete a visual examination, including monocular halo size measurement for both eyes using Vision Monitor device (MonCv3; Metrovision). An on-field evaluation took place at night at the UTAC CERAM test track to obtain disability glare measures using the DEGT.
RESULTS
A significant correlation was found between the two glare tests and Bland-Altman analysis reveals a good agreement with a bias of 73.7 arcmin between the halo size measurements obtained from the DEGT and Vision Monitor. The results of the present study demonstrate that the DEGT is a valid method to test halo size and is adapted to evaluate the benefits of an antiglare device for drivers in an ecological situation.
简介
本研究旨在验证驾驶员生态眩光测试（DEGT），该测试旨在通过与实验室眩光测试进行比较来衡量前照灯眩光高级驾驶辅助系统（ADAS）的益处。
方法
招募了 24 名年龄在 55 至 70 岁之间的参与者，进行了视力检查，包括使用 Vision Monitor 设备（MonCv3；Metrovision）对双眼的单眼晕轮大小进行测量。在 UTAC CERAM 测试赛道上的夜间进行现场评估，使用 DEGT 获得失能眩光测量值。
结果
两种眩光测试之间存在显著相关性， Bland-Altman 分析显示，从 DEGT 和 Vision Monitor 获得的晕轮大小测量值之间存在 73.7 弧分的偏差，具有良好的一致性。本研究的结果表明，DEGT 是一种测试晕轮大小的有效方法，适用于评估生态条件下防眩光装置对驾驶员的益处。
Zotero 插件