Department of Surgery, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, 200 Hawkins Dr., Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, 145 N Riverside Dr., Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 Sep;46(9):1663-1667. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.03.003. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
Chemoradiation therapy (CRT) is the standard treatment for anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) but can have significant treatment related toxicities. Recent studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of local excision (LE) for stage I ASCC with comparable oncologic outcomes to CRT. We aimed to evaluate this finding in a large population-based database.
Patients diagnosed with stage I (T1N0M0) ASCC were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, 2004-2015. Treatment approach was categorized as CRT or LE. Factors associated with treatment approach and cause-specific survival (CSS) were analyzed for the entire cohort and after stratification by tumor size (≤1 cm and 1-2 cm).
Among 883 patients, 56% had ASCCs 1-2 cm in size and 77% received CRT. Mean age was 60 years, 65% were female, and 90% were White. Factors independently associated with receiving CRT were, being female, higher tumor grade, and tumor size 1-2 cm. Unadjusted 5-year CSS for CRT was 96% while for LE it was 98% (p = 0.048). After adjusting for available confounders, treatment approach was not associated with worse CSS, however being Black (HR = 8.7) and uninsured (HR = 13.7) were independently associated with worse prognosis. After stratification by tumor size, there was still no significant difference in 5-year CSS by treatment approach.
LE was performed in a significant proportion of patients but was not independently associated with worse CSS compared to CRT. In appropriately selected patients with well differentiated ASCCs ≤1 cm, LE could be an acceptable management option but studies measuring outcomes such as local recurrence are needed.
放化疗(CRT)是肛门鳞状细胞癌(ASCC)的标准治疗方法,但会产生显著的治疗相关毒性。最近的研究表明,对于 I 期 ASCC,局部切除术(LE)与 CRT 的肿瘤学结果相当有效。我们旨在通过大型基于人群的数据库来评估这一发现。
从 2004 年至 2015 年的监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库中确定了 I 期(T1N0M0)ASCC 患者。将治疗方法分为 CRT 或 LE。分析了整个队列以及按肿瘤大小(≤1cm 和 1-2cm)分层后的治疗方法和特定原因生存率(CSS)的相关因素。
在 883 名患者中,56%的患者肿瘤大小为 1-2cm,77%的患者接受 CRT。平均年龄为 60 岁,65%为女性,90%为白人。独立与接受 CRT 相关的因素为女性、肿瘤分级较高和肿瘤大小为 1-2cm。CRT 的未调整 5 年 CSS 为 96%,而 LE 为 98%(p=0.048)。在调整了可用混杂因素后,治疗方法与 CSS 无不良预后相关,但黑人和无保险与不良预后相关(HR=8.7 和 HR=13.7)。按肿瘤大小分层后,治疗方法与 5 年 CSS 无显著差异。
LE 在相当一部分患者中实施,但与 CRT 相比,并不独立与 CSS 不良预后相关。在分化良好的≤1cm 的 ASCC 患者中,如果选择合适,LE 可能是一种可接受的治疗方法,但需要研究评估局部复发等结局。