Suppr超能文献

基于人群的队列分析:对于老年局部晚期肛门癌患者,放化疗与单纯放疗的疗效比较。

A Population-Based Cohort Analysis of Chemoradiation Versus Radiation Alone for Definitive Treatment of Stage I Anal Cancer in Older Patients.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

出版信息

Dis Colon Rectum. 2018 Jul;61(7):787-794. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001103.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although the benefit of chemoradiation over radiation therapy alone has been shown in randomized trials for stage II to III squamous cell of the anus, this benefit is not clear for patients with stage I cancer. Nevertheless, most societal recommendations endorse chemoradiation for patients with stage I squamous cell carcinoma of the anus despite the lack of proven benefit and potential increase in toxicity.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine whether outcomes are improved with the addition of chemotherapy versus radiation alone for stage I squamous cell carcinoma of the anus.

DESIGN

This was a cohort analysis using Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registry linked to Medicare from 1996 to 2011. Propensity-score methods were used to control for potential confounding.

SETTINGS

This was a population-based study.

PATIENTS

Medicare eligible patients (age >65 y or with an eligible disability) with stage I squamous cell carcinoma of the anus treated with either definitive radiation alone or chemoradiation were included.

INTERVENTIONS

Radiation or chemoradiation was the intervention.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Overall survival, disease-free survival, cause-specific survival, colostomy-free survival, and acute or late toxicities were measured.

RESULTS

A total of 200 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus were identified who received chemoradiation versus 99 treated with lone radiotherapy. Median age was 72 years and did not differ by treatment (p = 0.6). Patients receiving chemoradiation had improved unadjusted overall survival compared with lone radiotherapy, but after adjustment using propensity-score methods there was no difference in overall survival (HR = 0.7 (95% CI, 0.4-1.0)), cause-specific survival (HR = 0.7 (95% CI, 0.3-1.6)), colostomy-free survival (HR = 1.1 (95% CI, 0.5-2.5)), or disease-free survival (HR = 0.9 (95% CI, 0.6-1.4)). Chemoradiation was associated with an increased risk of select early and late toxicities.

LIMITATIONS

This is a retrospective series from an anonymous database. The data might not be relevant for younger, healthier patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Lone radiation may be associated with adequate oncologic outcomes when used to treat older and sicker patients with stage I anal cancer. Physicians should discuss the potential benefits and harms of adding chemotherapy for the treatment of these patients. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A628.

摘要

背景

虽然随机试验已经证明了对于 II 至 III 期肛门鳞癌患者,化疗联合放疗优于单纯放疗,但对于 I 期癌症患者,这种获益尚不清楚。尽管缺乏明确的获益且可能增加毒性,但是大多数社会推荐都支持对 I 期肛门鳞癌患者进行放化疗。

目的

本研究旨在确定与单纯放疗相比,化疗联合放疗是否能改善 I 期肛门鳞癌患者的预后。

设计

这是一项使用 1996 年至 2011 年监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)登记处与医疗保险相结合的队列分析。采用倾向评分法来控制潜在的混杂因素。

设置

这是一项基于人群的研究。

患者

纳入接受单纯根治性放疗或放化疗的 I 期肛门鳞癌、有资格享受医疗保险的患者(年龄>65 岁或有合格残疾)。

干预

放疗或放化疗为干预措施。

主要观察指标

总生存、无病生存、疾病特异性生存、无造口术生存以及急性或迟发性毒性。

结果

共纳入 200 例接受放化疗的肛门鳞癌患者和 99 例接受单纯放疗的患者。中位年龄为 72 岁,两组间无差异(p=0.6)。与单纯放疗相比,接受放化疗的患者无调整的总生存率得到改善,但在使用倾向评分法进行调整后,总生存率无差异(HR=0.7(95%CI,0.4-1.0))、疾病特异性生存率(HR=0.7(95%CI,0.3-1.6))、无造口术生存率(HR=1.1(95%CI,0.5-2.5))或无病生存率(HR=0.9(95%CI,0.6-1.4))。放化疗与特定的早期和晚期毒性增加相关。

局限性

这是一项来自匿名数据库的回顾性研究。这些数据可能不适用于年轻、健康的患者。

结论

当用于治疗 I 期肛门癌的老年和体弱患者时,单纯放疗可能与足够的肿瘤学疗效相关。医生应该讨论为这些患者添加化疗的潜在益处和危害。

欲观看视频摘要,请访问:http://links.lww.com/DCR/A628。

相似文献

3
Chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal: Comparison of one versus two cycles mitomycin-C.
Radiother Oncol. 2015 Nov;117(2):240-5. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.08.015. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
7

引用本文的文献

2
Construction and validation of a prognostic nomogram for anal squamous cell carcinoma.
Cancer Med. 2022 Jan;11(2):392-405. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4458. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
3
Research on Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Systemic Therapy Strategies for Anal Cancer.
Cancers (Basel). 2021 May 1;13(9):2180. doi: 10.3390/cancers13092180.
5
De-Escalation of Therapy for Patients with Early-Stage Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus.
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Apr 27;13(9):2099. doi: 10.3390/cancers13092099.
6
Radiotherapy alone versus chemoradiotherapy for stage I anal squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Jun;36(6):1111-1122. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-03846-5. Epub 2021 Jan 24.
8
Executive Summary of the American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria for Treatment of Anal Cancer.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Nov 1;105(3):591-605. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.06.2544. Epub 2019 Jul 6.
9
Trends in Risks for Second Primary Cancers Associated With Index Human Papillomavirus-Associated Cancers.
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Sep 7;1(5):e181999. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1999.
10
The Role of Multiagent Chemoradiation in the Management and Prognosis of Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Apr;23(4):712-719. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-04068-x. Epub 2019 Jan 14.

本文引用的文献

2
ACR Appropriateness Criteria®-Anal Cancer.
Gastrointest Cancer Res. 2014 Jan;7(1):4-14.
3
Changing patterns of anal canal carcinoma in the United States.
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Apr 20;31(12):1569-75. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.45.2524. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
4
Node-negative T1-T2 anal cancer: radiotherapy alone or concomitant chemoradiotherapy?
Radiother Oncol. 2012 Jan;102(1):62-7. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.09.015. Epub 2011 Oct 10.
8
Results of definitive irradiation in a series of 305 epidermoid carcinomas of the anal canal.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 Aug 1;56(5):1259-73. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(03)00417-6.
9
Utility of the SEER-Medicare data to identify chemotherapy use.
Med Care. 2002 Aug;40(8 Suppl):IV-55-61. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000020944.17670.D7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验