The safety and satisfaction of ovarian tissue cryopreservation in prepubertal and adolescent girls.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Is ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) for fertility preservation in prepubertal and adolescent girls safe, and who would benefit most from the procedure?

DESIGN

Survey and retrospective study including patients who had OTC under the age of 18 years in a single centre for fertility preservation. Serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels were measured as a marker for detection of diminished ovarian reserve.

RESULTS

Fifty-three from 102 women participated in the survey (12 deceased, 19 declined, 17 unreachable, 1 palliative). The average age at OTC was 14.8 ± 2.3 (range: 6-17) years and at survey 21.9 ± 4.3 (range: 16-33) years. Ovarian tissue retrieval (laparoscopy: n = 45, laparotomy: n = 8) was without complications in 52 cases. In 23 (53.5%) of the 43 women who were post-menarchal at OTC, transient amenorrhoea occurred. At survey, 15 women reported a regular menstrual cycle, 25 used oral contraceptives, 9 women reported hormone replacement therapy due to primary ovary insufficiency and 4 had amenorrhoea. Two patients reported the birth of a healthy child after IVF, while 51 patients are still childless, mostly due to their young age (mean: 21.2 years). To date, one patient has had transplantation of the ovarian tissue (17 years at cryopreservation). Forty-nine of the interviewees would again decide on OTC, while three argued against it on the basis of the previous financial cost; one woman was unsure.

CONCLUSIONS

Children with cancer may be at risk for gonadal insufficiency. OTC is practically the only technique that can be offered to young girls. The procedure is safe and well accepted.