Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minnesota.
Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minnesota.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Sep;13(9):1863-1872. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.01.016. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to compare remodeling of left ventricular (LV) structure and function after transcatheter stent therapy with remodeling of LV structure and function after surgical therapy for COA.
Transcatheter stent therapy is as effective as surgery in producing acute hemodynamic improvement in patients with coarctation of aorta (COA). However, LV remodeling after transcatheter COA intervention has not been systematically investigated.
LV remodeling was assessed at 1, 3, and 5 years post-intervention by using LV mass index (LVMI), LV end-diastolic dimension, LV ejection fraction, LV global longitudinal strain (LVGLS), LV mitral annular tissue Doppler early velocity (LVe'), and ratio of mitral inflow pulsed wave Doppler early velocity and e' (E/e') ratio.
There were 44 patients in the transcatheter group and 128 patients in the surgical group. Compared to the surgical group, the transcatheter group had less regression of LVMI (-4.6; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -5.5 to -3.7 vs. -7.3; 95% CI: -8.4 to -6.6 g/m; p < 0.001), less improvement in LVGLS (2.1; 95% CI: 1.8 to 2.4 vs. 2.9; 95% CI: 2.6 to 3.2%; p = 0.024), and in e' (1.0 ; 95% CI: 0.7 to 1.2 vs. 1.5 ; 95% CI: 1.3 to 1.7 cm/s; p = 0.009) at 5 years post-intervention. Exploratory analysis showed a correlation between change in LVMI and LVGLS, and between change in LVMI and mitral annular tissue Doppler early velocity (e'), and this correlations were independent of the type of intervention received.
Transcatheter stent therapy was associated with less remodeling of LV structure and function during mid-term follow-up. As transcatheter stent therapy becomes more widely used in the adult COA population, there is a need for ongoing clinical monitoring to determine if these observed differences in LV remodeling translate to differences in clinical outcomes.
本回顾性队列研究的目的是比较经导管支架治疗与外科治疗 COA 后左心室(LV)结构和功能重塑的效果。
经导管支架治疗与外科治疗一样,可有效改善主动脉缩窄(COA)患者的急性血液动力学。然而,经导管 COA 介入治疗后 LV 重塑尚未得到系统研究。
通过左心室质量指数(LVMI)、LV 舒张末期内径、LV 射血分数、LV 整体纵向应变(LVGLS)、LV 二尖瓣环组织多普勒早期速度(LVe')和二尖瓣流入道脉冲波多普勒早期速度与 e'的比值(E/e')评估介入后 1、3 和 5 年的 LV 重塑。
共纳入 44 例经导管组和 128 例外科组患者。与外科组相比,经导管组 LVMI 下降较少(-4.6;95%置信区间[CI]:-5.5 至-3.7 比-7.3;95%CI:-8.4 至-6.6 g/m2;p<0.001),LVGLS 改善较少(2.1;95%CI:1.8 至 2.4 比 2.9;95%CI:2.6 至 3.2%;p=0.024),e'改善较少(1.0;95%CI:0.7 至 1.2 比 1.5;95%CI:1.3 至 1.7 cm/s;p=0.009)。介入后 5 年。探索性分析显示 LVMI 变化与 LVGLS 变化之间以及 LVMI 变化与二尖瓣环组织多普勒早期速度(e')之间存在相关性,这些相关性独立于所接受的干预类型。
在中期随访期间,经导管支架治疗与 LV 结构和功能重塑减少相关。随着经导管支架治疗在成人 COA 人群中的应用越来越广泛,需要进行持续的临床监测,以确定这些观察到的 LV 重塑差异是否转化为临床结局的差异。