Endocrinologie Métabolisme et Prévention Cardiovasculaire, Institut E3M et IHU Cardiométabolique (ICAN), Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Medizinische Klinik IV-Grosshadern, Klinikum der Universität München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Adv Ther. 2020 May;37(5):1724-1736. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01285-2. Epub 2020 Mar 21.
Assess achievement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets in European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) guidelines.
Systematic literature review.
Medline, EMBASE, Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature.
Observational studies reporting LDL-C levels/target attainment, measured between 1 August 2006 to 31 August 2017, in European adults with established cardiovascular disease (CVD), diabetes with target organ damage, familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) or 10-year risk of fatal CVD ≥ 5% (assessed by Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation [SCORE]).
Two reviewers independently extracted relevant studies and assessed study quality using the Risk of Bias for Non-Randomised Studies-Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. Primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving LDL-C targets in the 2011/2016 ESC/EAS guidelines. Where available, patient characteristics were presented as means weighted by sample size. The proportions of patients achieving LDL-C targets in the 5 years before and after publication of the 2011 guidelines were compared using a chi-square test.
Across 81 eligible studies (303,534 patients), achievement of LDL-C < 1.8 mmol/L was poor among patients with established CVD (16%; range 9-56%) and at very high risk of CVD (SCORE ≥ 10% [18%; 14-25%]). In individuals with FH, SCORE 5-10%, or diabetes and target organ damage, LDL-C < 2.5 mmol/L was achieved by 15% (9-22%), 46% (21-55%) and 13% (6-34%), respectively. Comparing the 5 years before/after publication of the 2011 guidelines, target achievement increased significantly over time but remained suboptimal (LDL-C < 1.8, 22% versus 15%; LDL-C < 2.5, 68% versus 61%; both p < 0.001; established CVD group only).
These data show suboptimal LDL-C control among European patients at high risk of CVD. Those at greatest overall risk (clinically established CVD or at least a 10% 10-year risk of fatal CVD) had the lowest achievement of 2011/2016 EAS/ESC LDL-C targets. With lower LDL-C targets advocated in 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines, this unmet need will increase.
PROSPERO registration number; CRD77844.
评估欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)/欧洲动脉粥样硬化学会(EAS)指南中低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)目标的实现情况。
系统文献回顾。
Medline、EMBASE、Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature。
报告 2006 年 8 月 1 日至 2017 年 8 月 31 日期间欧洲成年人心血管疾病(CVD)、糖尿病伴靶器官损伤、家族性高胆固醇血症(FH)或 10 年致命 CVD 风险≥5%(通过系统冠状动脉风险评估[SCORE]评估)患者 LDL-C 水平/目标达标情况的观察性研究。
两名评审员独立提取相关研究,并使用非随机干预研究的偏倚风险(ROBINS-I)工具评估研究质量。主要结局是 2011/2016 ESC/EAS 指南中患者达到 LDL-C 目标的比例。在可用的情况下,按样本量加权表示患者特征。使用卡方检验比较 2011 年指南发布前后 5 年内患者达到 LDL-C 目标的比例。
在 81 项符合条件的研究(303534 例患者)中,患有已确诊 CVD(16%;范围 9-56%)和极高 CVD 风险(SCORE≥10%[18%;14-25%])的患者实现 LDL-C<1.8mmol/L 的比例较差。在 FH 患者中,SCORE 为 5-10%或糖尿病伴靶器官损伤的患者,LDL-C<2.5mmol/L 的达标率分别为 15%(9-22%)、46%(21-55%)和 13%(6-34%)。比较 2011 年指南发布前后的 5 年,目标达标率随时间显著增加,但仍不理想(LDL-C<1.8mmol/L,22%比 15%;LDL-C<2.5mmol/L,68%比 61%;均 P<0.001;仅在已确诊 CVD 组)。
这些数据显示,欧洲高危 CVD 患者 LDL-C 控制不佳。总体风险最高的患者(临床确诊的 CVD 或至少有 10 年致命 CVD 风险 10%)实现 2011/2016 EAS/ESC LDL-C 目标的比例最低。随着 2019 ESC/EAS 指南中 LDL-C 目标值的降低,这一未满足的需求将会增加。
PROSPERO 注册号;CRD77844。