Cameron Duncan H, Rowa Karen, McKinnon Margaret C, Rector Neil A, McCabe Randi E
Anxiety Treatment and Research Clinic, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Expert Rev Neurother. 2020 May;20(5):425-438. doi: 10.1080/14737175.2020.1746644. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
: Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a heterogeneous disorder, with multiple symptom presentations. Delineating the neuropsychological characteristics associated with previously identified symptom clusters may therefore be useful in assisting to better define symptom subtypes of OCD.: This review summarizes the existing literature on the assessment of neuropsychological performance in symptom-based dimensions of OCD. Results of 23 studies are described and the methodological issues and challenges present in this body of literature are discussed.: The current state of the literature precludes a meaningful meta-analysis of cognitive dysfunction across the breadth of symptom dimensions of OCD. This is due primarily to significant methodological differences observed between studies, both in terms of neuropsychological measures and symptom subtyping methods employed, and any resulting meta-analytic results would be biased by varying quality of evidence. Future studies addressing these limitations should include more consistent neuropsychology measures and methods of classifying OCD symptoms with the aim of reproducing the results of previous research to identify more concrete patterns of neuropsychological performance across dimensions; best practices and alternative approaches are discussed.
强迫症(OCD)是一种具有多种症状表现的异质性疾病。因此,描绘与先前确定的症状群相关的神经心理学特征可能有助于更好地定义强迫症的症状亚型。
本综述总结了现有关于强迫症基于症状维度的神经心理学表现评估的文献。描述了23项研究的结果,并讨论了该文献中存在的方法学问题和挑战。
目前的文献状况使得无法对强迫症症状维度的认知功能障碍进行有意义的荟萃分析。这主要是由于研究之间在神经心理学测量和所采用的症状亚型分类方法方面存在显著的方法学差异,并且任何由此产生的荟萃分析结果都会因证据质量的不同而产生偏差。解决这些局限性的未来研究应包括更一致的神经心理学测量方法和强迫症症状分类方法,旨在重现先前研究的结果,以确定跨维度更具体的神经心理学表现模式;讨论了最佳实践和替代方法。