• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

严重精神疾病中的共同决策:一项比较研究。

Shared decision-making in serious mental illness: A comparative study.

机构信息

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Australia.

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University and Peninsula Health, Australia.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Aug;103(8):1637-1644. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.03.009. Epub 2020 Mar 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2020.03.009
PMID:32201171
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare consumer and mental health professionals' (MHPs) preferences for decision-making in China and Europe.

METHODS

This study used cross-sectional design; Chinese data were collected by questionnaires and European data were obtained from the literature. Data were analysed using t-test, One-way ANOVA and Pearson correlation coefficient as appropriate.

RESULTS

This study involved 800 people diagnosed with severe mental illness and 506 MHPs. Chinese participants rated lower scores on preference for participation in decision-making (PD = 1.88) and information (IN = 2.70) than European participants (PD = 2.05, IN = 2.83). Chinese consumers rated a higher score on IN (2.78) but lower on for PD (1.75) than MHPs (IN = 2.64, PD = 1.97). Chinese consumers' education level is positively associated with preference for PD and IN. The gender, occupation and age of Chinese MHPs are associated with preference for PD.

CONCLUSION

Both Chinese and Europeans had preference for shared involvement in mental health, while the preference in China is less. Opinions of consumers and MHPs might be different, regarding the level of patient involvement in specific decisions.

PRACTICE IMPLICATION

It is essential that consumers' preferences are understood for provision of optimal support for a shared decision-making approach.

摘要

目的

比较中、欧消费者和精神卫生专业人员(MHPs)在决策方面的偏好。

方法

本研究采用横断面设计;中国数据通过问卷调查收集,欧洲数据从文献中获得。适当使用 t 检验、单因素方差分析和 Pearson 相关系数进行数据分析。

结果

本研究共纳入 800 名确诊严重精神疾病患者和 506 名 MHPs。中国参与者在参与决策(PD=1.88)和信息获取(IN=2.70)方面的偏好评分低于欧洲参与者(PD=2.05,IN=2.83)。中国消费者在信息获取方面的评分较高(IN=2.78),但在参与决策方面的评分较低(PD=1.75),低于 MHPs(IN=2.64,PD=1.97)。中国消费者的受教育程度与参与决策和信息获取的偏好呈正相关。中国 MHPs 的性别、职业和年龄与参与决策的偏好相关。

结论

中、欧双方均倾向于共同参与精神卫生决策,但中国的偏好程度较低。在特定决策中,消费者和 MHPs 对患者参与程度的意见可能不同。

实践意义

了解消费者的偏好对于提供最佳支持以实现共同决策方法至关重要。

相似文献

1
Shared decision-making in serious mental illness: A comparative study.严重精神疾病中的共同决策:一项比较研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Aug;103(8):1637-1644. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.03.009. Epub 2020 Mar 14.
2
Shared decision-making in the treatment of adolescents diagnosed with depression: A cross-sectional survey of mental health professionals in China.中国青少年抑郁症治疗中的共享决策:精神卫生专业人员的横断面调查。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Jun;31(3):340-351. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12990. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
3
Trust, discrimination and preference for shared decision-making in adolescents diagnosed with depression: Implications from Chinese mental health professionals.信任、歧视与偏好对共同决策:中国精神卫生专业人员视角下青少年抑郁症的诊断启示
Patient Educ Couns. 2024 May;122:108137. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108137. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
4
Self-Stigma and Consumer Participation in Shared Decision Making in Mental Health Services.自我污名与消费者参与心理健康服务中的共同决策
Psychiatr Serv. 2017 Aug 1;68(8):783-788. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201600282. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
5
Preferences of older and younger adults with serious mental illness for involvement in decision-making in medical and psychiatric settings.患有严重精神疾病的老年人和年轻人在医疗和精神科环境中参与决策的偏好。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2008 Oct;16(10):826-33. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e318181f992.
6
Perceptions of shared decision-making in severe mental illness: An integrative review.严重精神疾病中共享决策的认知:综合评价。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Apr;27(2):103-127. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12558. Epub 2019 Dec 6.
7
Consumer satisfaction with psychiatric services: The role of shared decision making and the therapeutic relationship.消费者对精神科服务的满意度:共同决策与治疗关系的作用。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2015 Sep;38(3):242-8. doi: 10.1037/prj0000114. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
8
Factors associated with shared decision-making preferences among veterans with serious mental illness.患有严重精神疾病的退伍军人中与共同决策偏好相关的因素。
Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Dec 1;65(12):1409-13. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201400131. Epub 2014 Nov 17.
9
Empowerment and satisfaction in a multinational study of routine clinical practice.一项关于常规临床实践的跨国研究中的赋权与满意度
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2015 May;131(5):369-78. doi: 10.1111/acps.12365. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
10
Consumer and relationship factors associated with shared decision making in mental health consultations.与心理健康咨询中共同决策相关的消费者和关系因素。
Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Dec 1;65(12):1488-91. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300563.

引用本文的文献

1
Research Progress of Shared Decision-Making in Schizophrenia with Anxiety.精神分裂症伴焦虑症共同决策的研究进展
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2024 Nov 5;20:2095-2101. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S483126. eCollection 2024.
2
Exploring Patient Preferences Related to Shared Decision-Making in Chronic Disease Management.探索慢性病管理中与共同决策相关的患者偏好
Cureus. 2024 Sep 25;16(9):e70214. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70214. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Shared decision-making in healthcare in mainland China: a scoping review.中国大陆医疗卫生中的共享决策:范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2023 Sep 7;11:1162993. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1162993. eCollection 2023.
4
A comparison of patient-reported quality between inpatient services for mental and physical health: A tertiary-hospital-based survey in China.精神与身体健康住院服务中患者报告的质量比较:一项基于中国三级医院的调查
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Feb 9;14:1090892. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1090892. eCollection 2023.
5
Patients' and family members' experiences of psychiatric inpatient services in China: a comparison based on a dyadic design.患者及其家属对中国精神科住院服务的体验:基于对偶设计的比较。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2022 Oct;57(10):2119-2129. doi: 10.1007/s00127-022-02296-w. Epub 2022 May 2.
6
Development and evaluation of a decision aid for family surrogate decision-makers for patients with acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) in ICUs: a study protocol.重症监护病房中急性肾损伤需要肾脏替代治疗(RRT)患者的家庭替代决策者决策辅助工具的开发与评估:一项研究方案
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 12;11(2):e043385. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043385.
7
Yonder: New normal, dental risk, shared decision making in China, antidepressants on Instagram, and podcast of the month.那边:新常态、牙科风险、中国的共同决策、Instagram上的抗抑郁药以及本月播客。
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Aug 27;70(698):454. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X712433. Print 2020 Sep.