Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, UKR University Hospital Regensburg, 93042, Regensburg, Germany.
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, UKR University Hospital Regensburg, 93042, Regensburg, Germany.
J Dent. 2020 May;96:103326. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103326. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
This study investigated the in-vitro performance and fracture force of anterior implant-supported tooth-coloured fixed dental prosthesis (FDPs). Different material types with varying flexural strength and modulus of elasticity were compared with screw-retained or bonded application.
Identical anterior FDPs (tooth 11-13; n = 80) from materials (flexural strength 240-1150 MPa, modulus 7.6-210 GPa; 1x lithiumdisilicate ceramic, 2x zirconia (4Y-TZP, 5Y-FSZ), 3x resin-based composites (with different flexural strength and modulus)) were milled. FDPs were grouped into chairside (bonded) and labside (screw-retained) procedure. To simulate a 5-year clinical application, thermal cycling with mechanical loading (TCML) was accomplished. TCML-performance and fracture force were evaluated and failure patterns were analysed. Data were statistically investigated (Kolmogorov-Smirnov-test, one-way-ANOVA; post-hoc-Bonferroni, α = 0.05).
TCML did not lead to any cracks, fractures or chipping on all tested FDPs. Fracture values varied between 1208.9 ± 354.6 N (experimental resin-based composite) and 2094.3 ± 293.4 N (4Y-TZP) for FDPs without screw channel. With screw channel the results ranged between 1297.9 ± 268.3 N (5Y-FSZ) and 2129.3 ± 321.7 N (4Y-TZP). The influence of the screw channel was not significant for all materials (p ≥ 0.218). Modulus of elasticity and flexural strength had influence on the fracture force only in the individual material groups. Fractures at the connector were predominant for ceramic and zirconia. Resin-based composites primarily showed radial fractures in abutment region or mixed failure types. FDPs with/without screw-channel showed comparable types of failure.
TCML did not lead to drop-outs or failures for all FDPs. Individual materials showed no different in-vitro performance, but varying fracture force after TCML. Independent from material, screw channels did not weaken the FDPs. All tested systems showed sufficient properties for an anterior implant application.
本研究旨在评估体外实验条件下,不同材料在前牙区种植体支持的牙色固定义齿(FDP)的性能和断裂力。本研究比较了不同弯曲强度和弹性模量的材料,以及螺丝固位或粘结固位的修复体。
从具有不同弯曲强度(240-1150 MPa)和弹性模量(7.6-210 GPa)的材料(1 种锂硅玻璃陶瓷,2 种氧化锆(4Y-TZP、5Y-FSZ),3 种树脂基复合材料(具有不同的弯曲强度和弹性模量))中,铣制出 80 个相同的前牙 FDP(11-13 号牙)。FDP 被分为椅旁(粘结)和技工室(螺丝固位)两组。为了模拟 5 年的临床应用,进行了热循环和机械加载(TCML)实验。对 TCML 性能和断裂力进行了评估,并分析了失效模式。数据采用 Kolmogorov-Smirnov 检验、单因素方差分析(one-way-ANOVA)进行统计学分析;组间比较采用 Bonferroni 检验(α=0.05)。
所有测试的 FDP 都没有在 TCML 实验中出现裂纹、断裂或碎裂。对于没有螺丝通道的 FDP,断裂值在 1208.9±354.6 N(实验性树脂基复合材料)和 2094.3±293.4 N(4Y-TZP)之间变化;而对于有螺丝通道的 FDP,断裂值在 1297.9±268.3 N(5Y-FSZ)和 2129.3±321.7 N(4Y-TZP)之间变化。对于所有材料,螺丝通道的影响都不显著(p≥0.218)。弹性模量和弯曲强度仅在个别材料组中对断裂力有影响。陶瓷和氧化锆的主要失效模式为连接体处断裂,而树脂基复合材料则主要表现为基牙区的放射状断裂或混合失效类型。有/无螺丝通道的 FDP 表现出相似的失效类型。
在所有 FDP 中,TCML 都没有导致脱落或失效。单独的材料没有表现出不同的体外性能,但在 TCML 后有不同的断裂力。与材料无关,螺丝通道并没有削弱 FDP。所有测试的系统在前牙种植应用中都表现出足够的性能。