Bauer Robert, Zacher Julian, Strasser Thomas, Rosentritt Martin
Associate Professor, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, UKR University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Associate Professor, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, UKR University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Oct;126(4):575-580. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.08.008. Epub 2020 Sep 19.
Interim restorations represent an essential clinical treatment step; however, limited information is available concerning the performance of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) interim materials.
The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the performance and fracture load of resin anterior implant-supported interim fixed partial dentures (IFPDs).
Identical anterior resin IFPDs (maxillary central incisor to canine; n=16 per material) were milled from polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) or di-methacrylate (DMA) systems with different filler content. The IFPD groups were split to simulate a chairside (cemented implant-supported prosthesis) or laboratory procedure (screw-retained implant-supported prosthesis). A cartridge DMA material served as a control. After interim cementation, combined thermocycling and mechanical loading (TCML) was performed on all restorations to approximate a maximum of 2.5 years of clinical function. Behavior during TCML and fracture force was determined, and failures were analyzed. The data were statistically investigated (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, 1-way-ANOVA; post hoc Bonferroni, Kaplan-Meier survival, α=.05).
Drop out during TCML varied between no failures and complete failure during loading. For most systems, failure occurred between 120 000 and 600 000 mechanical loading cycles. For IFPDs without a screw channel fracture, values varied between 644 ±263 N and 987 ±101 N. Those with a screw channel fracture failed between 493 ±89 N and 951 ±248 N. Individual IFPDs had significantly higher mean fracture loads (P<.002), but the mean fracture values between IFPDs with and without a screw channel were not significantly different (P>.137). Failures were characterized by fracture of the connector (n=53) followed by mixed failures (n=22) or fractures at the abutment (n=21).
These interim materials are sufficiently fracture resistant for the fabrication of implant-supported anterior IFPDs and are expected to survive between 6 months and 2 years before failure. The stability of IFPDs depended on the type of material but not on the restoration design (with or without a screw channel).
临时修复体是临床治疗的重要步骤;然而,关于计算机辅助设计与计算机辅助制造(CAD-CAM)临时材料性能的信息有限。
本体外研究的目的是评估树脂前牙种植体支持的临时固定局部义齿(IFPD)的性能和断裂载荷。
从具有不同填料含量的聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)或二甲基丙烯酸酯(DMA)系统中铣削出相同的前牙树脂IFPD(上颌中切牙至尖牙;每种材料n = 16)。将IFPD组进行拆分,以模拟椅旁操作(粘结式种植体支持的修复体)或实验室操作(螺丝固位式种植体支持的修复体)。一种筒装DMA材料用作对照。临时粘结后,对所有修复体进行热循环和机械加载(TCML)联合处理,以模拟最多2.5年的临床功能。测定TCML过程中的行为和断裂力,并对失败情况进行分析。对数据进行统计学研究(柯尔莫哥洛夫-斯米尔诺夫检验、单因素方差分析;事后邦费罗尼检验、卡普兰-迈耶生存分析,α = 0.05)。
TCML过程中的脱落情况从无失败到加载过程中的完全失败不等。对于大多数系统,失败发生在120000至600000次机械加载循环之间。对于没有螺丝通道断裂的IFPD,其值在644±263 N和987±101 N之间变化。有螺丝通道断裂的IFPD在493±89 N和951±248 N之间失败。单个IFPD的平均断裂载荷显著更高(P < 0.002),但有螺丝通道和没有螺丝通道的IFPD之间的平均断裂值没有显著差异(P > 0.137)。失败的特征是连接体断裂(n = 53),其次是混合失败(n = 22)或基牙处断裂(n = 21)。
这些临时材料对于制作种植体支持的前牙IFPD具有足够的抗断裂能力,预计在失败前可存活6个月至2年。IFPD的稳定性取决于材料类型,而不取决于修复体设计(有无螺丝通道)。