Suppr超能文献

接受肩关节镜下肩袖修复术的患者如何定义最大疗效改善?一项为期 1 年的随访研究。

How Is Maximum Outcome Improvement Defined in Patients Undergoing Shoulder Arthroscopy for Rotator Cuff Repair? A 1-Year Follow-Up Study.

机构信息

Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.

Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2020 Jul;36(7):1805-1810. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.02.047. Epub 2020 Mar 20.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To (1) determine the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and Constant-Murley subjective score thresholds for achieving maximal outcome improvement (MOI) after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and (2) identify preoperative predictors of reaching the ASES threshold for achieving MOI.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed to identify patients undergoing rotator cuff repair at a high-volume institution from January 2014 to January 2017 with a 1-year minimum follow-up. Patient characteristics, as well as preoperative and postoperative outcome scores, were analyzed. MOI for the ASES and SANE score were calculated as previously described, and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine thresholds for percentage of maximal improvements for each outcome measure based on a satisfaction anchor question. Last, a logistic regression model was used to identify predictors of reaching the ASES threshold for achieving MOI.

RESULTS

A total of 220 patients were included in the final analysis. There was a statistically significant increase in score average across all 3 outcome measures (P < .001 for all), with 162 (73.6%) patients rating their surgical outcome as satisfactory at 1-year follow-up. The ROC curve analysis demonstrated that ASES, SANE, and Constant-Murley threshold percentages for achieving MOI was 69.5% (area under the curve [AUC], 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-0.91; P < .001), 75% (AUC, 0.814; 95% CI, 0.758-0.871; P < .001), and 55.1% (AUC, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.783-0.898; P < .001), respectively. Logistic regression demonstrated that workers compensation cases (odds ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.55-0.86; P = .001) and dominant-sided surgery (odds ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59-0.88; P = .002) were predictors of not achieving maximal improvement on the ASES score.

CONCLUSION

Achieving 69.5% of maximal ASES score improvement or 75% of maximal SANE score improvement is indicative of achieving patient satisfaction after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Preoperative variables including workers compensation cases and surgery to the dominant side were predictors of not achieving maximal improvement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, case series.

摘要

目的

(1)确定美国肩肘外科医师学会(ASES)、单项评估数值评估(SANE)和Constant-Murley 主观评分的阈值,以实现关节镜下肩袖修复后最大程度的术后改善(MOI);(2)确定达到 ASES 阈值以实现 MOI 的术前预测因素。

方法

进行了一项回顾性队列研究,以确定 2014 年 1 月至 2017 年 1 月在一家高容量机构接受肩袖修复的患者,随访时间至少为 1 年。分析了患者的特征,以及术前和术后的结果评分。根据满意度锚定问题,计算了 ASES 和 SANE 评分的 MOI,并使用接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析确定了每个结果测量的最大改善百分比的阈值。最后,使用逻辑回归模型确定了达到 ASES 阈值以实现 MOI 的预测因素。

结果

共纳入 220 例患者进行最终分析。所有 3 项结果测量的评分平均值均有统计学显著提高(所有 P <.001),162 例(73.6%)患者在 1 年随访时对手术结果表示满意。ROC 曲线分析表明,ASES、SANE 和 Constant-Murley 达到 MOI 的百分比阈值分别为 69.5%(曲线下面积 [AUC],0.86;95%置信区间 [CI],0.81-0.91;P <.001)、75%(AUC,0.814;95% CI,0.758-0.871;P <.001)和 55.1%(AUC,0.84;95% CI,0.783-0.898;P <.001)。逻辑回归表明,工人赔偿案件(比值比,0.69;95% CI,0.55-0.86;P =.001)和优势侧手术(比值比,0.72;95% CI,0.59-0.88;P =.002)是 ASES 评分未达到最大改善的预测因素。

结论

达到 ASES 评分改善 69.5%或 SANE 评分改善 75%,提示关节镜下肩袖修复后患者满意度达到。包括工人赔偿案件和优势侧手术在内的术前变量是无法达到最大改善的预测因素。

证据水平

IV,病例系列。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验