• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

二甲双胍治疗与 2 型糖尿病患者髋部骨折风险:一项基于人群的队列研究。

Metformin therapy and hip fracture risk among patients with type II diabetes mellitus: A population-based cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Bone. 2020 Jun;135:115325. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115325. Epub 2020 Mar 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.bone.2020.115325
PMID:32201359
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the potential association of exposure to metformin therapy with the risk of hip fracture in adult patients with type II diabetes. We included patients with diabetes who were registered in the 2010 sample cohort database of the National Health Insurance Service in South Korea.

METHODS

The patients who had been prescribed continuous oral metformin therapy for a 1-year period in 2010 were defined as the metformin group, while those who were not prescribed metformin during the same period were classified as the control group. The primary endpoint of this study was the development of hip fracture between January 2011 and December 2015.

RESULTS

A total of 64,878 patients (31,300 patients in the metformin group and 32,439 patients in the control group) were included in this study. Among those, 1655 patients (2.6%) had experienced a hip fracture. After a propensity score matching, a total of 37,378 patients (18,689 patients in each group) were included in the analysis. Using a time-dependent Cox regression analysis on the propensity score-matched cohort, the exposure to metformin was not significantly associated with the development of hip fracture compared to the control group (hazard ratio: 1.00, 95% confidence interval: 0.86 to 1.16; P = 0.985). Similar results were observed using sensitivity analysis of a multivariable time-dependent Cox regression model of the entire cohort (hazard ratio: 0.78, 95% confidence interval: 0.36 to 1.69; P = 0.525).

CONCLUSIONS

This population-based cohort study in South Korea showed that there was no significant association between the exposure to metformin therapy and hip fracture in patients with type II diabetes mellitus.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨二甲双胍治疗暴露与成年 2 型糖尿病患者髋部骨折风险之间的潜在关联。我们纳入了在韩国国民健康保险服务 2010 年样本队列数据库中登记的糖尿病患者。

方法

2010 年接受连续口服二甲双胍治疗 1 年的患者被定义为二甲双胍组,同期未服用二甲双胍的患者被归类为对照组。本研究的主要终点是 2011 年 1 月至 2015 年 12 月期间发生髋部骨折。

结果

共有 64878 名患者(二甲双胍组 31300 名,对照组 32439 名)纳入本研究。其中 1655 名(2.6%)患者发生髋部骨折。经过倾向评分匹配后,共有 37378 名患者(每组 18689 名)纳入分析。在倾向评分匹配队列中使用时间依赖性 Cox 回归分析,与对照组相比,二甲双胍暴露与髋部骨折的发生无显著相关性(风险比:1.00,95%置信区间:0.86 至 1.16;P=0.985)。在整个队列的多变量时间依赖性 Cox 回归模型的敏感性分析中也观察到了类似的结果(风险比:0.78,95%置信区间:0.36 至 1.69;P=0.525)。

结论

这项基于人群的韩国队列研究表明,在 2 型糖尿病患者中,二甲双胍治疗暴露与髋部骨折之间无显著关联。

相似文献

1
Metformin therapy and hip fracture risk among patients with type II diabetes mellitus: A population-based cohort study.二甲双胍治疗与 2 型糖尿病患者髋部骨折风险:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Bone. 2020 Jun;135:115325. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115325. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
2
Metformin use and risk of COVID-19 among patients with type II diabetes mellitus: an NHIS-COVID-19 database cohort study.二甲双胍的使用与 II 型糖尿病患者 COVID-19 风险:一项 NHIS-COVID-19 数据库队列研究。
Acta Diabetol. 2021 Jun;58(6):771-778. doi: 10.1007/s00592-020-01666-7. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
3
Metformin Use and the Risk of Cancer in Patients with Diabetes: A Nationwide Sample Cohort Study.二甲双胍的使用与糖尿病患者癌症风险:一项全国性样本队列研究。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2020 Feb;13(2):195-202. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-19-0427. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
4
Real-world antidiabetic drug use and fracture risk in 12,277 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a nested case-control study.真实世界中 12277 例 2 型糖尿病患者抗糖尿病药物使用与骨折风险:一项巢式病例对照研究。
Osteoporos Int. 2018 Sep;29(9):2079-2086. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4581-y. Epub 2018 Jun 2.
5
Effects of metformin exposure on neurodegenerative diseases in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.二甲双胍暴露对老年 2 型糖尿病患者神经退行性疾病的影响。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2017 Oct 3;79(Pt B):77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2017.06.002. Epub 2017 Jun 3.
6
Association between Metformin Use and Survival in Nonmetastatic Rectal Cancer Treated with a Curative Resection: A Nationwide Population Study.二甲双胍使用与接受根治性切除的非转移性直肠癌患者生存之间的关联:一项全国性人群研究。
Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Jan;49(1):29-36. doi: 10.4143/crt.2016.128. Epub 2016 Jul 4.
7
Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor compared with sulfonylurea in combination with metformin: cardiovascular and renal outcomes in a propensity-matched cohort study.二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂与磺脲类药物联合二甲双胍比较:倾向评分匹配队列研究中的心血管和肾脏结局。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019 Mar 11;18(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12933-019-0835-z.
8
Metformin use and mortality in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease: national, retrospective, observational, cohort study.二甲双胍在晚期慢性肾脏病患者中的应用与死亡率:全国性、回顾性、观察性队列研究。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015 Aug;3(8):605-14. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(15)00123-0. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
9
Metformin and Cervical Cancer Risk in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes: A Population-Based Study in Korea.二甲双胍与新诊断 2 型糖尿病患者宫颈癌风险:来自韩国的一项基于人群的研究。
Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2022 Dec;37(6):929-937. doi: 10.3803/EnM.2022.1613. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
10
Relationship between metformin use and mortality in tuberculosis patients with diabetes: a nationwide cohort study.二甲双胍的使用与糖尿病合并结核病患者死亡率的关系:一项全国性队列研究。
Korean J Intern Med. 2024 Mar;39(2):306-317. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2023.303. Epub 2024 Feb 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Drugs Used in Pharmacotherapy of Type 2 Diabetes on Bone Density and Risk of Bone Fractures.2 型糖尿病药物治疗中药物对骨密度和骨折风险的影响。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Feb 26;60(3):393. doi: 10.3390/medicina60030393.
2
Metformin treatment reduces the incidence of osteoporosis: a two-sample Mendelian randomized study.二甲双胍治疗可降低骨质疏松症的发生率:两样本孟德尔随机研究。
Osteoporos Int. 2024 Jun;35(6):1089-1098. doi: 10.1007/s00198-023-07013-0. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
3
Effects of metformin on bone mineral density and bone turnover markers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
二甲双胍对骨密度和骨转换标志物的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 23;13(6):e072904. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072904.
4
Comparison of the Effects of Metformin and Thiazolidinediones on Bone Metabolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.二甲双胍和噻唑烷二酮类药物对骨代谢影响的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 May 8;59(5):904. doi: 10.3390/medicina59050904.
5
The use of metformin, sulfonylurea compounds and insulin and the risk of hip fractures in diabetic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.二甲双胍、磺酰脲类化合物和胰岛素的使用与糖尿病患者髋部骨折风险的关系:观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 May 9;24(1):367. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06493-9.
6
The interplay between bone and heart health as reflected in medication effects: A narrative review.骨骼与心脏健康相互作用在药物作用中的体现:一篇综述性文章。
Womens Health (Lond). 2023 Jan-Dec;19:17455057231165549. doi: 10.1177/17455057231165549.
7
Association of metformin use with fracture risk in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.二甲双胍治疗与 2 型糖尿病患者骨折风险的相关性:一项观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Jan 11;13:1038603. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1038603. eCollection 2022.
8
α-Hemihydrate calcium sulfate/n-hydroxyapatite combined with metformin promotes osteogenesis and .α-半水硫酸钙/纳米羟基磷灰石联合二甲双胍促进成骨作用及……(原文此处不完整)
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Sep 30;10:899157. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.899157. eCollection 2022.
9
Metformin: Is It the Well Wisher of Bone Beyond Glycemic Control in Diabetes Mellitus?二甲双胍:在糖尿病中除了血糖控制之外,它对骨骼还有益处?
Calcif Tissue Int. 2021 Jun;108(6):693-707. doi: 10.1007/s00223-021-00805-8. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
10
Helicobacter pylori Related Diseases and Osteoporotic Fractures (Narrative Review).幽门螺杆菌相关疾病与骨质疏松性骨折(叙述性综述)
J Clin Med. 2020 Oct 12;9(10):3253. doi: 10.3390/jcm9103253.