Beattie James M, Khatib Rani, Phillips Ceri J, Williams Simon G
Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, UK.
Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Open Heart. 2020 Mar 11;7(1):e001153. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2019-001153. eCollection 2020.
Iron deficiency (ID), with or without anaemia (IDA), is an important comorbidity in people with chronic heart failure (HF), but the prevalence and significance in those admitted with HF is uncertain. We assessed the prevalence of ID or IDA in adults (age ≥21 years) hospitalised with a primary diagnosis of HF, and examined key metrics associated with these secondary diagnoses.
A retrospective cohort study of Hospital Episode Statistics describing all adults admitted to National Health Service (NHS) hospitals across England from April 2015 through March 2016 with primary diagnostic discharge coding as HF, with or without subsidiary coding for ID/IDA.
78 805 adults were admitted to 177 NHS hospitals with primary coding as HF: 26 530 (33.7%) with secondary coding for ID/IDA, and 52 275 (66.3%) without. Proportionately more patients coded ID/IDA were admitted as emergencies (94.8% vs 87.6%; p<0.0001). Tending to be older and female, they required a longer length of stay (15.8 vs 12.2 days; p<0.0001), with higher costs (£3623 vs £2918; p<0.0001), the cumulative excess expenditure being £21.5 million. HF-related (8.2% vs 5.2%; p<0.0001) and all-cause readmission rates (25.8% vs 17.7%; p<0.05) at ≤30 days were greater in those with ID/IDA against those without, and they manifested a small but statistically significant increased inpatient mortality (13.5% v 12.9%; p=0.009).
For adults admitted to hospitals in England, principally with acute HF, ID/IDA are significant comorbidities and associated with adverse outcomes, both for affected individuals, and the health economy.
缺铁(ID),无论是否伴有贫血(IDA),都是慢性心力衰竭(HF)患者的一种重要合并症,但在因HF住院的患者中其患病率及意义尚不确定。我们评估了以HF为主要诊断住院的成年人(年龄≥21岁)中ID或IDA的患病率,并研究了与这些次要诊断相关的关键指标。
一项回顾性队列研究,利用医院事件统计数据描述了2015年4月至2016年3月期间在英格兰国民健康服务(NHS)医院住院的所有成年人,其主要诊断出院编码为HF,有无ID/IDA的辅助编码。
78805名成年人入住177家NHS医院,主要编码为HF:26530名(33.7%)有ID/IDA的辅助编码,52275名(66.3%)没有。按比例计算,更多编码为ID/IDA的患者是急诊入院(94.8%对87.6%;p<0.0001)。他们往往年龄较大且为女性,住院时间更长(15.8天对12.2天;p<0.0001),费用更高(3623英镑对2918英镑;p<0.0001),累计额外支出达2150万英镑。ID/IDA患者在≤30天时的HF相关再入院率(8.2%对5.2%;p<0.0001)和全因再入院率(25.8%对17.7%;p<0.05)高于无ID/IDA的患者,且其住院死亡率有小幅但具有统计学意义的升高(13.5%对12.9%;p=0.009)。
对于在英格兰住院的成年人,主要是急性HF患者,ID/IDA是重要的合并症,且与不良结局相关,对受影响个体和卫生经济均如此。