Hoschar Sophia, Albarqouni Loai, Ladwig Karl-Heinz
Institute of Epidemiology II, Mental Health Research Unit, Helmholtz Zentrum, München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.
Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Medical Center- University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany.
Open Heart. 2020 Mar 11;7(1):e001175. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2019-001175. eCollection 2020.
Interventions aiming at reducing prehospital delay (PHD) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) have yielded inconsistent findings. Therefore, we aimed to systematically review studies which investigated the impact of educational interventions on reducing PHD in patients with ACS. We searched four electronic databases (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane) from inception throughout December 2016 for studies that reported the impact of either mass-media or personalised intervention on PHD. Reporting quality was assessed with the Template for Intervention Description and Replication checklist for interventional trials. Two reviewers screened 12 184 abstracts and performed full-text screening on 86 articles, leading to 34 articles which met our inclusion criteria. We found 18 educational interventions with a total of 180 914 participants (range: n=100-125 161) and a median of 1342 participants. Among these educational interventions, 13 campaigns employed a mass-media approach and five a personalised approach. Ten studies yielded no significant effects on the primary outcome while the remaining interventions reported a significant reduction with a decrease between 17 and 324 min (median reduction: 40 min, n=5). The success was partly driven by an increase in emergency medical services use. Two studies reported an increase in acute myocardial infarction knowledge. We observed no superiority of the personalised over the mass-media approach. Although methodological shortcomings and the heterogeneity of included interventions still do not allow definite recommendations for future campaigns, it becomes evident that either mass media or personalised interventions can be successful in reducing PHD, especially those who address behavioural consequences and psychological barriers (eg, denial) and provide practical action plan considerations as part of their campaign messages. CRD42017055684 (PROSPERO registration number).
旨在减少急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者院前延误(PHD)的干预措施,其研究结果并不一致。因此,我们旨在系统回顾那些调查教育干预措施对减少ACS患者PHD影响的研究。我们检索了四个电子数据库(护理学与健康相关文献累积索引、医学索引数据库、荷兰医学文摘数据库、考克兰系统评价数据库),从建库至2016年12月,查找那些报告了大众媒体或个性化干预对PHD影响的研究。采用干预描述与复制模板清单对干预性试验的报告质量进行评估。两名评审员筛选了12184篇摘要,并对86篇文章进行了全文筛选,最终有34篇文章符合我们的纳入标准。我们发现了18项教育干预措施,共有180914名参与者(范围:n = 100 - 125161),中位数为1342名参与者。在这些教育干预措施中,13项活动采用了大众媒体方法,5项采用了个性化方法。10项研究对主要结局未产生显著影响,而其余干预措施报告有显著降低,减少幅度在17至324分钟之间(中位数减少:40分钟,n = 5)。成功部分归因于紧急医疗服务使用的增加。两项研究报告了急性心肌梗死知识的增加。我们未观察到个性化方法优于大众媒体方法。尽管方法学上的缺陷以及纳入干预措施的异质性仍然不允许为未来的活动提出明确建议,但很明显,大众媒体或个性化干预措施都可以成功减少PHD,尤其是那些解决行为后果和心理障碍(如否认)并在其活动信息中提供实际行动计划考量的措施。CRD42017055684(国际前瞻性系统评价注册编号)