Suppr超能文献

切换至第二种硫嘌呤类药物治疗炎症性肠病成年和老年患者:来自 ENEIDA 注册研究的全国性研究。

Switching to a Second Thiopurine in Adult and Elderly Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Nationwide Study From the ENEIDA Registry.

机构信息

Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain.

Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

J Crohns Colitis. 2020 Sep 16;14(9):1290-1298. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaa055.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Although commonly used in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD], thiopurines frequently cause intolerance, and switching to a second thiopurine has only been reported in some small series. Ours aims in this study were to evaluate the safety of switching to a second thiopurine in a large cohort, and to assess the impact of age on tolerance.

METHODS

Adult IBD patients from the ENEIDA registry, who were switched to a second thiopurine due to adverse events [excluding malignancies and infections], were identified. At the beginning of thiopurine treatment, patients were divided by age into two groups: 18-50 and over 60 years of age. The rate and concordance of adverse events between the first and second thiopurines, treatment intolerance, and persistence with the second thiopurine were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 1278 patients [13% over 60 years of age] were switched to a second thiopurine. At 12 months, the cumulative probability of switch intolerance was 43%, and persistence with treatment was 49%. Independent risk factors of switch intolerance were age over 60 years (odds ratio [OR] 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-2.07; p = 0.017) , previous gastrointestinal toxicity [OR 1.4; 95% CI 1.11-1.78; p = 0.005], previous acute pancreatitis [OR 6.78; 95% CI 2.55-18.05; p <0.001], and exposure to the first thiopurine <6 months [OR 1.59; 95% CI 1.14-2.23; p = 0.007].

CONCLUSIONS

In a large series in clinical practice, switching to a second thiopurine proved to be a valid strategy. Tight monitoring of elderly IBD patients switching to a second thiopurine because of adverse events is recommended.

摘要

背景与目的

尽管在炎症性肠病[IBD]中经常使用硫嘌呤类药物,但它们经常引起不耐受,并且仅在一些小系列中报告过切换到第二种硫嘌呤类药物。我们在这项研究中的目的是评估在大型队列中切换到第二种硫嘌呤类药物的安全性,并评估年龄对耐受性的影响。

方法

从 ENEIDA 登记处中确定了因不良事件[不包括恶性肿瘤和感染]而切换到第二种硫嘌呤类药物的成年 IBD 患者。在开始硫嘌呤类药物治疗时,根据年龄将患者分为两组:18-50 岁和 60 岁以上。评估了第一种和第二种硫嘌呤类药物之间不良事件的发生率和一致性、治疗不耐受以及对第二种硫嘌呤类药物的坚持性。

结果

共 1278 例患者[13%年龄超过 60 岁]切换到第二种硫嘌呤类药物。在 12 个月时,切换不耐受的累积概率为 43%,治疗坚持率为 49%。切换不耐受的独立危险因素包括年龄超过 60 岁(优势比[OR] 1.49;95%置信区间[CI] 1.07-2.07;p = 0.017)、先前的胃肠道毒性(OR 1.4;95%CI 1.11-1.78;p = 0.005)、先前的急性胰腺炎(OR 6.78;95%CI 2.55-18.05;p<0.001)和暴露于第一种硫嘌呤类药物<6 个月(OR 1.59;95%CI 1.14-2.23;p = 0.007)。

结论

在临床实践中的一项大型研究中,切换到第二种硫嘌呤类药物被证明是一种有效的策略。建议对因不良事件切换到第二种硫嘌呤类药物的老年 IBD 患者进行密切监测。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验