Suppr超能文献

优化 2 个真实队列中炎症性肠病的硫唑嘌呤治疗:别嘌醇合并用药的影响?

Optimizing Thiopurine Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Among 2 Real-life Intercept Cohorts: Effect of Allopurinol Comedication?

机构信息

*Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; and †Department of Gastroenterology, Geriatrics, Internal and Intensive Care Medicine (Co-MIK), Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen-Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2017 Nov;23(11):2011-2017. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000001168.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Thiopurines (azathioprine and mercaptopurine) are frequently used immunosuppressive drugs to maintain remission in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Half of the conventional thiopurine-derivative users have to discontinue treatment within 5 years, mainly because of intolerable adverse events. Over recent years, different strategies to optimize thiopurine treatment were suggested, yet, studies describing the clinical effectiveness of these strategies remain scarce. The aims of this study were to compare tolerability and sustained clinical benefit of conventional thiopurine derivatives therapy among two 5-year real-life intercept cohorts and to assess the clinical value of specifically allopurinol cotherapy.

METHODS

In this retrospective single-center cohort study, we analyzed data from patients in whom weight-based thiopurine monotherapy was initiated between 2005 and 2009 (cohort 1) or between 2010 and 2014 (cohort 2). The initiation of the second cohort was synchronic to the start of allopurinol-based optimization in our center. Optimization strategies were extracted from patient charts.

RESULTS

In total, 105 patients were included (60 in cohort 1, and 45 in cohort 2). Metabolite measurement was performed in 37% versus 84% of the patients (P < 0.001). Subsequent optimization strategies were applied in 33% versus 58% of the patients because of inadequate metabolite concentrations, intolerance, or ineffectiveness (P = 0.01). Allopurinol was coadministered to therapy in 18 patients (40%) in the second cohort. Therapy was switched to thioguanine in 11 versus 6 patients (P > 0.05). Overall, total duration was longer in the second cohort (10.8 versus 34.1 months, P < 0.001). The number of ongoing thiopurine users (20% versus 49%) and sustained clinical benefit (13% versus 38%) were higher in the second cohort (both P < 0.05). This was mainly because of a decrease in hepatotoxicity after optimization (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Optimization of thiopurine therapy by the use of therapeutic drug monitoring with subsequent administration of allopurinol cotherapy successfully enhanced sustained clinical benefit and tolerability in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

摘要

背景

硫唑嘌呤(巯嘌呤)是常用的免疫抑制剂,用于维持炎症性肠病患者的缓解。有一半的常规硫嘌呤衍生物使用者在 5 年内不得不停止治疗,主要是因为无法耐受不良反应。近年来,提出了不同的优化硫嘌呤治疗的策略,但描述这些策略临床效果的研究仍然很少。本研究旨在比较两种 5 年真实拦截队列中常规硫嘌呤衍生物治疗的耐受性和持续临床获益,并评估别嘌醇联合治疗的临床价值。

方法

在这项回顾性单中心队列研究中,我们分析了 2005 年至 2009 年间(队列 1)或 2010 年至 2014 年间(队列 2)开始接受基于体重的硫嘌呤单药治疗的患者的数据。第二队列的启动与我们中心开始基于别嘌醇的优化同步。从患者图表中提取优化策略。

结果

共有 105 名患者入组(队列 1 60 名,队列 2 45 名)。37%的患者进行了代谢产物测量,84%的患者进行了代谢产物测量(P <0.001)。由于代谢物浓度不足、不耐受或无效,33%的患者与 58%的患者接受了后续的优化策略(P = 0.01)。第二队列中有 18 名患者(40%)联合应用别嘌醇治疗。11 名患者与 6 名患者(P > 0.05)将治疗转换为硫鸟嘌呤。总体而言,第二队列的治疗持续时间更长(10.8 与 34.1 个月,P <0.001)。第二队列中正在使用硫嘌呤的患者比例(20%比 49%,P <0.05)和持续临床获益的患者比例(13%比 38%,P <0.05)更高。这主要是由于优化后肝毒性降低(P <0.01)。

结论

通过使用治疗药物监测优化硫嘌呤治疗,并随后联合应用别嘌醇治疗,成功提高了炎症性肠病患者的持续临床获益和耐受性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c416/5647119/8c973763fabd/ibd-23-2011-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验