Suppr超能文献

曲线追踪中的性别差异。

Sex differences in curve tracing.

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

Can J Exp Psychol. 2020 Dec;74(4):330-345. doi: 10.1037/cep0000205. Epub 2020 Mar 23.

Abstract

The present study reports on 4 experiments aimed at investigating potential sex differences on a curve tracing task. Furthermore, curve tracing was used as an indirect approach to explore the holistic versus piecemeal strategy hypothesis used to account for sex differences in mental rotation. In Experiment 1, participants only completed a curve tracing task. The Navon (1977) local/global task was added in Experiment 2, whereas mental rotation was included in Experiment 3. Experiment 4 corrected issues encountered with the mental rotation task in Experiment 3. All 4 experiments showed a performance advantage for men on accuracy in curve tracing, although the Sex × Distance interaction required to support preference for a holistic strategy in men was not found. The Navon task findings supported the notion that men show a reduced global precedence effect when compared with women. The performance advantage for men in mental rotation only emerged in Experiment 4. Finally, the tasks showed a pattern of correlations suggestive of common components aside from attention. The General Discussion focuses on alternative explanations of the findings and further research required to elucidate them. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

本研究报告了 4 项实验,旨在调查曲线追踪任务中潜在的性别差异。此外,曲线追踪被用作一种间接方法,以探索整体与部分策略假说,该假说用于解释心理旋转中的性别差异。在实验 1 中,参与者仅完成了曲线追踪任务。在实验 2 中添加了纳冯(1977)局部/整体任务,而在实验 3 中则包含了心理旋转。实验 4 纠正了实验 3 中心理旋转任务中遇到的问题。尽管没有发现支持男性偏好整体策略的性别与距离的交互作用,但所有 4 个实验都表明男性在曲线追踪的准确性上表现出优势。纳冯任务的结果支持了这样一种观点,即与女性相比,男性表现出全球优先效应的降低。只有在实验 4 中,男性在心理旋转中的表现才具有优势。最后,这些任务的相关性表明,除了注意力之外,还有共同的成分。讨论部分重点讨论了对这些发现的替代解释以及进一步阐明这些发现所需的研究。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验