• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“控制命运连续体”如何帮助解释基因检测决策过程:扎根理论研究。

How the "control-fate continuum" helps explain the genetic testing decision-making process: a grounded theory study.

机构信息

Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.

Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Hum Genet. 2020 Aug;28(8):1010-1019. doi: 10.1038/s41431-020-0602-3. Epub 2020 Mar 16.

DOI:10.1038/s41431-020-0602-3
PMID:32203201
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7381626/
Abstract

Genetic testing decision-making for cancer predisposition is inherently complex. Understanding the mechanisms and influencing factors of the decision-making process is essential for genetic counselling and has not yet been investigated in Switzerland. This study's aim is thus to provide a theory about the individual's decision-making process regarding genetic testing for cancer predispositions in order to provide medical geneticists and genetic counsellors with insights into the needs and expectations of counsellees. We interviewed at-risk individuals who underwent genetic counselling in a clinical setting in Switzerland, using a grounded theory approach. Based on the interview data, we propose that a control-fate continuum, which is part of the individuals' life philosophy, importantly influences the decision-making process. Those in need for control decide differently compared with those leaving their future to fate. Several psychosocial factors influence the position on the control-fate continuum: "looking for certainty"; "anticipating consequences"; "being socially influenced"; "simplifying risks"; and "deciding intuitively vs reflectively". The control-fate continuum theory gives insights into the possible reasons behind decision-making regarding genetic testing for cancer predispositions. It includes both acceptors and decliners of genetic testing. Our theory helps healthcare professionals offering genetic counselling to anticipate problems within at-risk families and adapting their services to people's needs.

摘要

癌症风险遗传检测决策本身就很复杂。了解决策过程的机制和影响因素对于遗传咨询至关重要,但在瑞士尚未对此进行研究。因此,本研究旨在提出一个关于个体进行癌症风险遗传检测决策的理论,以便为医学遗传学家和遗传咨询师提供有关咨询对象的需求和期望的深入了解。我们在瑞士的临床环境中对有风险的个体进行了采访,采用了扎根理论方法。基于访谈数据,我们提出,控制-命运连续体是个体生活哲学的一部分,它对决策过程有重要影响。那些需要控制的人与那些将未来交给命运的人做出了不同的决定。一些心理社会因素影响着控制-命运连续体的位置:“寻找确定性”;“预测后果”;“受到社会影响”;“简化风险”;以及“凭直觉还是深思熟虑地做出决定”。控制-命运连续体理论深入了解了癌症风险遗传检测决策背后的可能原因。它包括接受和拒绝遗传检测的人。我们的理论有助于提供遗传咨询的医疗保健专业人员预测高危家庭中可能出现的问题,并根据人们的需求调整他们的服务。

相似文献

1
How the "control-fate continuum" helps explain the genetic testing decision-making process: a grounded theory study.“控制命运连续体”如何帮助解释基因检测决策过程:扎根理论研究。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2020 Aug;28(8):1010-1019. doi: 10.1038/s41431-020-0602-3. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
2
Decision making and experiences of young adults undergoing presymptomatic genetic testing for familial cancer: a longitudinal grounded theory study.青年在进行家族性癌症预先基因检测时的决策和体验:一项纵向扎根理论研究。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2018 Jan;26(1):44-53. doi: 10.1038/s41431-017-0030-1. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
3
Autonomy and social influence in predictive genetic testing decision-making: A qualitative interview study.预测性基因检测决策中的自主性和社会影响:一项定性访谈研究。
Bioethics. 2021 Feb;35(2):199-206. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12816. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
4
Factors shaping at-risk individuals' decisions to undergo genetic testing for cancer in Asia.亚洲癌症遗传检测高危个体决策的影响因素。
Health Soc Care Community. 2020 Sep;28(5):1569-1577. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12981. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
5
Paving the Way: A Grounded Theory of Discovery and Decision Making for Individuals With the CDH1 Marker.铺路石:CDH1 标志物个体的发现与决策的扎根理论。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2020 Jul 1;47(4):446-456. doi: 10.1188/20.ONF.446-456.
6
The use of heuristics in genetic testing decision-making: A qualitative interview study.遗传测试决策中的启发式方法使用:一项定性访谈研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 30;16(11):e0260597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260597. eCollection 2021.
7
Reproductive decision-making in young female carriers of a BRCA mutation.年轻女性 BRCA 基因突变携带者的生殖决策。
Hum Reprod. 2013 Apr;28(4):1006-12. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des441. Epub 2013 Jan 4.
8
Attitude towards and factors affecting uptake of population-based BRCA testing in the Ashkenazi Jewish population: a cohort study.基于人群的 BRCA 检测在阿什肯纳兹犹太人群体中的接受态度和影响因素:一项队列研究。
BJOG. 2019 May;126(6):784-794. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15654. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
9
Referral to cancer genetic counseling: are there stages of readiness?转诊至癌症遗传咨询:是否存在准备阶段?
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2006 Nov 15;142C(4):221-31. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.30109.
10
Nothing to lose: a grounded theory study of patients' and healthcare professionals' perspectives of being involved in the consent process for oncology trials with non-curative intent.无所得失:一项关于患者和医疗保健专业人员参与非治愈意图肿瘤试验同意过程的看法的扎根理论研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Oct 30;19(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00661-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Incomplete Penetrance of Population-Based Genetic Screening Results in Electronic Health Record.基于人群的基因筛查结果在电子健康记录中的不完全外显率。
Front Genet. 2022 Apr 27;13:866169. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.866169. eCollection 2022.
2
The use of heuristics in genetic testing decision-making: A qualitative interview study.遗传测试决策中的启发式方法使用:一项定性访谈研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 30;16(11):e0260597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260597. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
A qualitative study on decision-making about BRCA1/2 testing in Italian women.一项关于意大利女性进行 BRCA1/2 检测决策的定性研究。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 Sep;28(5):e13083. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13083. Epub 2019 May 5.
2
Content, evaluations and influences in newspaper coverage of predictive genetic testing: A comparative media content analysis from the United Kingdom and Switzerland.报纸对预测性基因检测的报道内容、评价及影响:来自英国和瑞士的比较性媒体内容分析
Public Underst Sci. 2019 Apr;28(3):256-274. doi: 10.1177/0963662518816014. Epub 2018 Dec 24.
3
Discussions about predictive genetic testing for Lynch syndrome: the role of health professionals and families in decisions to decline.关于林奇综合征预测性基因检测的讨论:健康专业人员和家庭在拒绝检测决定中的作用。
Fam Cancer. 2018 Oct;17(4):547-555. doi: 10.1007/s10689-018-0078-2.
4
Genetic Testing for Hereditary Breast Cancer: The Decision to Decline.遗传性乳腺癌的基因检测:拒绝检测的决定
Am Surg. 2018 Jan 1;84(1):154-160.
5
Decision making and experiences of young adults undergoing presymptomatic genetic testing for familial cancer: a longitudinal grounded theory study.青年在进行家族性癌症预先基因检测时的决策和体验:一项纵向扎根理论研究。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2018 Jan;26(1):44-53. doi: 10.1038/s41431-017-0030-1. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
6
Legislation of direct-to-consumer genetic testing in Europe: a fragmented regulatory landscape.欧洲直接面向消费者的基因检测立法:碎片化的监管格局。
J Community Genet. 2018 Apr;9(2):117-132. doi: 10.1007/s12687-017-0344-2. Epub 2017 Nov 18.
7
Risk Perception and Psychological Distress in Genetic Counselling for Hereditary Breast and/or Ovarian Cancer.遗传性乳腺癌和/或卵巢癌遗传咨询中的风险认知与心理困扰
J Genet Couns. 2017 Oct;26(5):999-1007. doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0072-0. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
8
Choosing not to undergo predictive genetic testing for hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes: expanding our understanding of decliners and declining.选择不接受遗传性结直肠癌综合征的预测性基因检测:拓展我们对拒绝者及拒绝行为的理解
J Behav Med. 2017 Aug;40(4):583-594. doi: 10.1007/s10865-016-9820-0. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
9
Cancer Risk Information Sharing: The Experience of Individuals Receiving Genetic Counseling for BRCA1/2 Mutations.癌症风险信息共享:接受BRCA1/2突变基因咨询的个体的经历。
J Health Commun. 2017 Feb;22(2):143-152. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2016.1258743. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
10
Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: User Motivations, Decision Making, and Perceived Utility of Results.直接面向消费者的基因检测:用户动机、决策过程及对检测结果的感知效用
Public Health Genomics. 2017;20(1):36-45. doi: 10.1159/000455006. Epub 2017 Jan 10.