Department of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Section of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Heart Rhythm. 2020 Aug;17(8):1298-1303. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.03.011. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
Injury to the cardiac venous structures can complicate left ventricular lead placement for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Little is known about the outcomes of coronary sinus (CS) dissection with or without perforation.
The purpose of this study was to determine the outcomes in patients who had a CS injury during CRT implantation.
All patients undergoing procedures for CRT implantation at the Cleveland Clinic (2001-2018) were enrolled in a prospectively maintained registry for procedural profiles and complications. All patients with cardiac venous injuries during the procedures were included.
CS injury occurred in 35 of 5011 patients (0.7%; 6 perforations (17.1%), 29 dissections without perforation (82.9%)). In patients with dissection in the absence of perforation, attempts at CS lead placement after dissection were successful in 21 of 29 patients (72.4%). In those with perforation (n=6, 17.1%), CS lead placement was successful in one of them (16.7%). Cardiac tamponade occurred in 2 patients (5.7%), and the procedure was aborted in both of them. Overall, CS lead placement failed in 13 patients (37%) but 9 (25.7%) underwent subsequent CRT with CS lead placement (n=6, 17.1%; median 58 days later) or epicardial leads (n=3, 8.6%). Three of the remaining 4 patients (8.6%) refused to undergo further procedures, and the fourth (2.9%) died of a complicated course.
CS injury is not common during CRT implantation procedures and did not preclude successful lead placement in 23 of 35 patients (65.7%) during the index procedure and 6 of 6 (100%) during the subsequent attempted procedures. A low rate of mortality was observed in such patients, but CS injury was associated with increased morbidity.
心脏静脉结构损伤可使心脏再同步治疗(CRT)的左心室导线放置复杂化。关于冠状窦(CS)夹层伴或不伴穿孔的结果知之甚少。
本研究旨在确定 CRT 植入过程中 CS 损伤患者的结局。
克利夫兰诊所(2001-2018 年)所有接受 CRT 植入术的患者均纳入前瞻性维护的程序档案和并发症登记处。所有在手术过程中出现心脏静脉损伤的患者均包括在内。
在 5011 例患者中(0.7%)发生 35 例 CS 损伤(6 例穿孔(17.1%),29 例无穿孔夹层(82.9%))。在无穿孔夹层的患者中,在夹层后尝试 CS 导线放置的 29 例患者中,21 例(72.4%)成功。在穿孔的 6 例患者中(17.1%),1 例成功放置 CS 导线(16.7%)。发生心脏压塞 2 例(5.7%),均在其中 2 例中停止手术。总体而言,13 例(37%)CS 导线放置失败,但 9 例(25.7%)随后接受 CS 导线放置(n=6,17.1%;中位数为 58 天后)或心外膜导线(n=3,8.6%)的 CRT。其余 4 例患者中的 3 例(8.6%)拒绝进一步手术,第 4 例(2.9%)死于复杂病程。
CS 损伤在 CRT 植入术中并不常见,在指数手术中,35 例患者中的 23 例(65.7%)和随后的尝试手术中 6 例患者中的 6 例(100%)中,并未妨碍成功放置导线。此类患者的死亡率较低,但 CS 损伤与发病率增加有关。