Suppr超能文献

每日接受 1 或 2 克头孢曲松的重症监护病房患者的临床结局比较。

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes among Intensive Care Unit Patients Receiving One or Two Grams of Ceftriaxone Daily.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Services, Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Aurora Health Care, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020 May 21;64(6). doi: 10.1128/AAC.00066-20.

Abstract

Intensive care unit (ICU) patients may experience ceftriaxone underexposure, but clinical outcomes data are lacking. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of ceftriaxone dosing on clinical outcomes among ICU patients without central nervous system (CNS) infection. A retrospective study of ICU patients receiving intravenous, empirical ceftriaxone for non-CNS infections was conducted. Patients ≥18 years of age who received ≤2 g of ceftriaxone daily for ≥72 h were included and categorized as receiving ceftriaxone 1 g or 2 g daily. The primary, composite outcome was treatment failure, defined as inpatient mortality and/or antibiotic escalation due to clinical worsening. Propensity score matching was performed based on the probability of receiving 2 g of ceftriaxone daily. Multivariable logistic regression determined the association between ceftriaxone dose and treatment failure in a propensity-matched cohort. A total of 212 patients were included in the propensity-matched cohort. The most common diagnoses (83.0%) were pneumonia and urinary tract infection. Treatment failure occurred in 17.0% and 5.7% of patients receiving 1 g and 2 g daily, respectively (0.0156). Overall inpatient mortality was 8.5%. Ceftriaxone 2 g dosing was associated with a reduced likelihood of treatment failure (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.190; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.059 to 0.607). Other independent predictors of treatment failure included sequential organ failure assessment score (aOR = 1.440; 95% CI = 1.254 to 1.653) and creatinine clearance at 72 h from ceftriaxone initiation (aOR = 0.980; 95% CI = 0.971 to 0.999). Therefore, ceftriaxone at 2 g daily, when used as appropriate antimicrobial coverage, may be appropriate for ICU patients with lower mortality risk.

摘要

重症监护病房(ICU)患者可能会出现头孢曲松剂量不足的情况,但缺乏临床结局数据。本研究的目的是确定 ICU 患者中没有中枢神经系统(CNS)感染的情况下,头孢曲松剂量对临床结局的影响。对接受静脉经验性头孢曲松治疗非 CNS 感染的 ICU 患者进行了回顾性研究。纳入年龄≥18 岁且每日接受≤2 g 头孢曲松治疗≥72 h 的患者,并分为每日接受 1 g 或 2 g 头孢曲松治疗的患者。主要复合结局是治疗失败,定义为住院患者死亡和/或因临床恶化而升级抗生素。根据每日接受 2 g 头孢曲松的概率进行倾向评分匹配。多变量逻辑回归确定了在倾向评分匹配队列中头孢曲松剂量与治疗失败之间的关系。共有 212 例患者纳入倾向评分匹配队列。最常见的诊断(83.0%)为肺炎和尿路感染。分别有 17.0%和 5.7%的患者每日接受 1 g 和 2 g 头孢曲松治疗后出现治疗失败(0.0156)。总体住院患者死亡率为 8.5%。每日给予 2 g 头孢曲松剂量与治疗失败的可能性降低相关(调整后的优势比[aOR] = 0.190;95%置信区间[CI] = 0.059 至 0.607)。治疗失败的其他独立预测因素包括序贯器官衰竭评估评分(aOR = 1.440;95%CI = 1.254 至 1.653)和头孢曲松开始后 72 h 的肌酐清除率(aOR = 0.980;95%CI = 0.971 至 0.999)。因此,当作为适当的抗菌覆盖时,每日给予 2 g 头孢曲松可能适合具有较低死亡率风险的 ICU 患者。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Renal recovery after acute kidney injury.急性肾损伤后的肾功能恢复
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Jun;43(6):855-866. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4809-x. Epub 2017 May 2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验