Torabi Sina J, Spock Todd, Cardoso Bruno, Chao Janet, Manes R Peter, Judson Benjamin L
Section of Otolaryngology, Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Yale Cancer Center, Smilow Cancer Hospital, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut.
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2020 Apr;81(2):198-205. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1683437. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of the multimodality treatment on survival in sinonasal minor salivary gland tumors. Adult clinical American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumor (T) 1-4a staged cases of sinonasal minor salivary gland tumors were isolated from the National Cancer Database (2004-2014). Multivariate regressions were performed to analyze the effect of multimodality treatment. A subset analysis was also performed in patients with positive margins following surgical management. We identified 556 cases, of which 293 (52.7%) patients were treated with surgery and radiotherapy (RT), 160 (28.8%) were treated with surgery alone, and 52 (9.4%) were treated with surgery and chemoradiotherapy (CRT). No patients were treated with chemotherapy alone. With surgery and CRT as a reference, the only treatment modality associated with decreased survival was RT alone (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.213 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.578-6.543]; = 0.001). Within a subset analysis of patients with positive margins, surgery was associated with decreased survival (HR: 2.021 [95% CI: 1.401-3.925]; = 0.038), but not triple modality therapy (HR: 1.700 [95% CI: 0.798-3.662]) when compared with surgery with RT. The most common treatment was surgery and RT, consistent with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines which recommends chemotherapy (CT) only in the most concerning cases. However, we found no difference in survival among most treatment modalities when compared with triple modality therapy, with the exception of RT alone. Although margins were prognostic within these cancers, we found no evidence that adjuvant CRT provides any survival benefit over surgery and RT, though surgery alone was associated with decreased survival.
本研究的目的是分析多模式治疗对鼻窦小涎腺肿瘤生存的影响。从美国国立癌症数据库(2004 - 2014年)中分离出美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)成人临床肿瘤(T)1 - 4a期的鼻窦小涎腺肿瘤病例。进行多因素回归分析以分析多模式治疗的效果。还对手术治疗后切缘阳性的患者进行了亚组分析。
我们共识别出556例病例,其中293例(52.7%)患者接受了手术加放疗(RT),160例(28.8%)仅接受了手术治疗,52例(9.4%)接受了手术加放化疗(CRT)。没有患者仅接受化疗。以手术加CRT作为对照,唯一与生存率降低相关的治疗方式是单纯放疗(风险比[HR]:3.213[95%置信区间(CI):1.578 - 6.543];P = 0.001)。在切缘阳性患者的亚组分析中,与手术加RT相比,手术与生存率降低相关(HR:2.021[95%CI:1.401 - 3.925];P = 0.038),但三联疗法(HR:1.700[95%CI:0.798 - 3.662])并非如此。
最常见的治疗方式是手术加RT,这与美国国立综合癌症网络(NCCN)指南一致,该指南仅在最严重的病例中推荐化疗(CT)。然而,与三联疗法相比,我们发现大多数治疗方式的生存率没有差异,单纯放疗除外。尽管切缘在这些癌症中具有预后意义,但我们没有发现证据表明辅助CRT比手术加RT能提供任何生存益处,不过单纯手术与生存率降低相关。