• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Intraoperative Sepsis: A Simulation Case for Anesthesiology Residents.术中脓毒症:麻醉科住院医师的模拟病例
MedEdPORTAL. 2020 Mar 13;16:10886. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10886.
2
Sepsis Care Pathway 2019.2019年脓毒症护理路径
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):4. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.4. eCollection 2019.
3
Anesthesiology Handoff Simulation Case: A Handoff From Intensive Care Unit to Operating Room for Anesthesiology Learners.麻醉学交接模拟病例:针对麻醉学学员的从重症监护病房到手术室的交接
MedEdPORTAL. 2020 Mar 13;16:10887. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10887.
4
Learning to Beat the Shock Clock: A Low-Fidelity Simulation Board Game for Pediatric and Emergency Medicine Residents.学会战胜休克时钟:一款面向儿科和急诊医学住院医师的低保真模拟棋盘游戏。
MedEdPORTAL. 2019 Feb 11;15:10804. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10804.
5
Prevention and Management of Operating Room Fire: An Interprofessional Operating Room Team Simulation Case.手术室火灾的预防与管理:跨专业手术室团队模拟案例
MedEdPORTAL. 2020 Jan 24;16:10871. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10871.
6
The Preparing Residents for International Medical Experiences (PRIME) Simulation Workshop: Equipping Surgery and Anesthesia Trainees for International Rotations.准备住院医师国际医学体验(PRIME)模拟研讨会:为外科和麻醉住院医师的国际轮转做好准备。
MedEdPORTAL. 2021 Feb 11;17:11088. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11088.
7
High-fidelity simulation in anesthesiology training: a survey of Canadian anesthesiology residents' simulator experience.高保真模拟在麻醉学培训中的应用:对加拿大麻醉学住院医师模拟器使用体验的调查。
Can J Anaesth. 2010 Feb;57(2):134-42. doi: 10.1007/s12630-009-9224-5.
8
Pediatric anaphylaxis in the operating room for anesthesia residents: a simulation study.手术室中麻醉住院医师面临的小儿过敏反应:一项模拟研究。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2017 Feb;27(2):205-210. doi: 10.1111/pan.13052. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
9
Improvement in process of care and outcome after a multicenter severe sepsis educational program in Spain.西班牙一项多中心严重脓毒症教育项目实施后护理过程及结局的改善
JAMA. 2008 May 21;299(19):2294-303. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.19.2294.
10
[Full-scale simulation in German medical schools and anesthesia residency programs : Status quo].[德国医学院校和麻醉住院医师培训项目中的全规模模拟:现状]
Anaesthesist. 2017 Jan;66(1):11-20. doi: 10.1007/s00101-016-0251-7. Epub 2016 Dec 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Sepsis and Clinical Simulation: What Is New? (and Old).脓毒症与临床模拟:新在何处?(以及旧有情况)
J Pers Med. 2023 Oct 8;13(10):1475. doi: 10.3390/jpm13101475.

本文引用的文献

1
Entrustable Professional Activity 10: Recognizing the Acutely Ill Patient-A Delirium Simulated Case for Students in Emergency Medicine.可托付专业活动10:识别急重症患者——针对急诊医学专业学生的谵妄模拟病例
MedEdPORTAL. 2016 Dec 2;12:10512. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10512.
2
Learning to Beat the Shock Clock: A Low-Fidelity Simulation Board Game for Pediatric and Emergency Medicine Residents.学会战胜休克时钟:一款面向儿科和急诊医学住院医师的低保真模拟棋盘游戏。
MedEdPORTAL. 2019 Feb 11;15:10804. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10804.
3
Sepsis in the Operating Room: A Simulation Case for Perioperative Providers.手术室中的脓毒症:围手术期医护人员的模拟病例
MedEdPORTAL. 2017 Mar 30;13:10563. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10563.
4
Flipped Classroom Module on Shock for Medical Students.面向医学生的休克翻转课堂模块
MedEdPORTAL. 2017 Feb 13;13:10542. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10542.
5
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义(脓毒症-3)》
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
6
Incidence and risk factors for sepsis in surgical patients: a cohort study.手术患者脓毒症的发生率和危险因素:一项队列研究。
J Crit Care. 2012 Apr;27(2):159-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.08.001. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
7
The development and psychometric testing of the Satisfaction with Simulation Experience Scale.《模拟体验满意度量表的编制及心理测量学检验》。
Nurse Educ Today. 2011 Oct;31(7):705-10. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.01.004. Epub 2011 Feb 2.

术中脓毒症:麻醉科住院医师的模拟病例

Intraoperative Sepsis: A Simulation Case for Anesthesiology Residents.

作者信息

Webb Timothy T, Boyer Tanna J, Mitchell Sally A, Eddy Christopher

机构信息

Assistant Professor of Clinical Anesthesia, Department of Anesthesia, Indiana University School of Medicine.

Director of Simulation, Department of Anesthesia, Indiana University School of Medicine.

出版信息

MedEdPORTAL. 2020 Mar 13;16:10886. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10886.

DOI:10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10886
PMID:32206702
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7083602/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Sepsis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in medicine and is managed in ICUs daily. Critical care training is a vital part of anesthesiology residency, and understanding the presentation, management, and treatment of septic shock is fundamental to intraoperative patient care.

METHODS

This simulation involved a 58-year-old man undergoing surgical debridement of a peripancreatic cyst with hemodynamic instability and septic shock. We conducted the simulation yearly for clinical anesthesia year 2 residents ( = 26) in 1-hour sessions with three to five learners at a time. The simulation covered the six Anesthesiology Milestones related to sepsis and septic shock as outlined in the Anesthesiology Milestones Project.

RESULTS

To date, 155 anesthesiology residents have completed the simulation. Commonly missed critical actions included failure to recognize the need for invasive lines, provide appropriate volumes of fluid resuscitation, inquire about blood cultures and antibiotics, and recognize the need for the patient to remain intubated. Most participants could appropriately diagnose and treat intraoperative septic shock, but all had moments of action or inaction to discuss and improve upon, and all learned from this scenario.

DISCUSSION

Simulation is an optimal way to practice the more rare and life-threatening clinical events in medicine. Even though septic shock is commonly managed in the ICU, it is relatively uncommon for it to develop acutely in the OR. This simulation is an effective and educational way to discuss the most recent sepsis/septic shock definition and review evidence-based guidelines for treatment.

摘要

引言

脓毒症是医学领域发病和死亡的主要原因,重症监护病房(ICU)每天都在对其进行管理。重症监护培训是麻醉学住院医师培训的重要组成部分,了解脓毒性休克的表现、管理和治疗是术中患者护理的基础。

方法

该模拟实验涉及一名58岁男性,因胰周囊肿手术清创出现血流动力学不稳定和脓毒性休克。我们每年为临床麻醉专业二年级住院医师(n = 26)进行一次模拟实验,每次1小时,每次有三到五名学员参与。该模拟实验涵盖了麻醉学里程碑项目中概述的与脓毒症和脓毒性休克相关的六个麻醉学里程碑。

结果

迄今为止,已有155名麻醉学住院医师完成了该模拟实验。常见的关键失误行为包括未能认识到需要建立有创血管通路、未能给予适当容量的液体复苏、未询问血培养及抗生素使用情况,以及未认识到患者需要继续插管。大多数参与者能够正确诊断和治疗术中脓毒性休克,但所有人都有需要讨论和改进的行动或不作为时刻,并且所有人都从该场景中学到了知识。

讨论

模拟是练习医学中较为罕见且危及生命的临床事件的最佳方式。尽管脓毒性休克在ICU中很常见,但在手术室中急性发生相对少见。该模拟实验是讨论最新脓毒症/脓毒性休克定义并复习循证治疗指南的一种有效且有教育意义的方式。