• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年泌尿外科手术患者的老年评估:系统文献回顾。

Geriatric assessment among elderly patients undergoing urological surgery: A systematic literature review.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Ludwik Rydygier Memorial Specialized Hospital, Kraków, Poland.

Department of General and Oncologic Urology, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland.

出版信息

Adv Clin Exp Med. 2020 Mar;29(3):399-407. doi: 10.17219/acem/115085.

DOI:10.17219/acem/115085
PMID:32207587
Abstract

The elderly constitute the group of patients who most often undergo elective urological procedures, and they are at the highest risk of poor surgical outcomes because of comorbidity and frailty. The current model of qualification for surgery is often subjective and based on tools which do not address the characteristics of the elderly. The Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) and screening tools can help in the evaluation of older, particularly frail patients. The aim of the study was to review the literature on the usefulness of preoperative geriatric evaluation in patients undergoing urological treatment. The review was based on MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library bibliographic databases from 2000-2017 for full-text, English-language publications meeting pre-defined criteria. Six prospective and 3 retrospective studies were selected for further analysis. The patient populations, methods of geriatric assessment, interventions, and outcome measures varied between the studies. None of the studies were randomized controlled trials. In 2 studies, the CGA was used; in other studies, rather basic screening tests were used. In only 2 studies, an intervention was performed after the CGA. In general, the variables of the CGA were both prospectively and retrospectively significant predictors of complications of urological surgery. Although the use of CGA is not a standard practice in everyday urological clinical practice, components of the CGA appear to be predictive of postoperative complications. Therefore, inclusion of geriatric assessment as part of routine preoperative care in geriatric urology patients should be considered. Because of the lack of randomized controlled trials on preoperative CGAs in urology patients, further studies are needed.

摘要

老年人是最常接受择期泌尿外科手术的患者群体,由于合并症和虚弱,他们面临着最差手术结果的最高风险。目前的手术资格模式往往是主观的,并且基于的工具并不能解决老年人的特点。综合老年评估(CGA)和筛选工具可帮助评估年龄较大、特别是体弱的患者。本研究旨在回顾关于在接受泌尿外科治疗的患者中进行术前老年评估的文献。该综述基于 2000 年至 2017 年 MEDLINE/PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆全文英文出版物数据库,根据预先确定的标准选择前瞻性和回顾性研究。选择了 6 项前瞻性和 3 项回顾性研究进行进一步分析。患者人群、老年评估方法、干预措施和结局测量在研究之间存在差异。没有一项研究是随机对照试验。在 2 项研究中使用了 CGA;在其他研究中,使用了相当基本的筛选测试。仅在 2 项研究中,在 CGA 后进行了干预。总的来说,CGA 的变量是泌尿外科手术并发症的前瞻性和回顾性显著预测因素。尽管 CGA 的使用不是日常泌尿外科临床实践中的标准做法,但 CGA 的组成部分似乎可以预测术后并发症。因此,应考虑将老年评估作为老年泌尿外科患者常规术前护理的一部分。由于缺乏泌尿外科患者术前 CGA 的随机对照试验,需要进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Geriatric assessment among elderly patients undergoing urological surgery: A systematic literature review.老年泌尿外科手术患者的老年评估:系统文献回顾。
Adv Clin Exp Med. 2020 Mar;29(3):399-407. doi: 10.17219/acem/115085.
2
Prevalence of frailty syndrome in urological patients undergoing major elective surgical procedure due to malignancy.因恶性肿瘤接受择期大手术的泌尿外科患者中衰弱综合征的患病率。
Cent European J Urol. 2022;75(1):52-58. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2022.0021. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
3
Predictive Value of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment on Early Postoperative Complications Following Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study.全面老年评估对腰椎狭窄症手术后早期术后并发症的预测价值:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Nov 1;45(21):1498-1505. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003597.
4
Geriatric assessment in surgical oncology: a systematic review.老年医学评估在肿瘤外科中的应用:一项系统评价。
J Surg Res. 2015 Jan;193(1):265-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.07.004. Epub 2014 Jul 5.
5
Evaluation and establishment of a ward-based geriatric liaison service for older urological surgical patients: Proactive care of Older People undergoing Surgery (POPS)-Urology.为老年泌尿外科手术患者评估并建立基于病房的老年联络服务:老年患者手术主动护理(POPS)-泌尿外科。
BJU Int. 2017 Jul;120(1):123-129. doi: 10.1111/bju.13526. Epub 2016 Jun 4.
6
Implementation of frailty preoperative assessment to predict outcome in patients undergoing urological surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.实施虚弱术前评估以预测接受泌尿外科手术患者的结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BJU Int. 2021 May;127(5):507-517. doi: 10.1111/bju.15314. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
7
Preoperative comprehensive geriatric assessment and multidisciplinary team input in older people undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery: A feasibility trial.术前综合老年评估和多学科团队在择期骨科手术老年人中的应用:一项可行性试验。
Australas J Ageing. 2024 Sep;43(3):553-560. doi: 10.1111/ajag.13302. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
8
Frailty screening methods for predicting outcome of a comprehensive geriatric assessment in elderly patients with cancer: a systematic review.衰弱筛查方法预测老年癌症患者综合老年评估结局的研究:系统综述。
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Oct;13(10):e437-44. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70259-0.
9
A randomized clinical study on the impact of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) based interventions on the quality of life of elderly, frail, onco-hematologic patients candidate to anticancer therapy: protocol of the ONCO-Aging study.基于综合老年评估(CGA)干预对老年、体弱、肿瘤血液病患者癌症治疗相关生活质量影响的随机临床研究:ONCO-Aging 研究方案。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 May 19;21(1):320. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02237-3.
10
A daily multidisciplinary assessment of older adults undergoing elective colorectal cancer surgery is associated with reduced delirium and geriatric syndromes.对择期接受结直肠癌症手术的老年患者进行每日多学科评估与减少谵妄和老年综合征有关。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2019 Mar;10(2):298-303. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2018.08.013. Epub 2018 Sep 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Implications of Activity of Daily Living for Clinical Care of Older Adults Undergoing Urological Surgery-A Cross-Sectional Study.日常生活活动能力对接受泌尿外科手术的老年人临床护理的影响——一项横断面研究
Nurs Open. 2025 Aug;12(8):e70289. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70289.
2
The Global RAdical Cystectomy Evaluation and Management (GRACEM) pathway: single-centre prospective observational cohort study protocol.全球根治性膀胱切除术评估与管理(GRACEM)路径:单中心前瞻性观察性队列研究方案
BJUI Compass. 2025 Jan 7;6(1):e376. doi: 10.1002/bco2.376. eCollection 2025 Jan.
3
Development of the UroARC Surgical Calculator: A Novel Risk Calculator for Older Adults Undergoing Surgery for Bladder Outlet Obstruction.
UroARC 手术计算器的开发:一种用于接受膀胱出口梗阻手术的老年患者的新型风险计算器。
J Urol. 2024 Sep;212(3):451-460. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003978. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
4
Geriatric prognostic scoring system predicts survival after hepatectomy for elderly patients with liver cancer.老年预后评分系统可预测老年肝癌患者肝切除术后的生存率。
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2023 Dec 19;8(3):498-506. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12762. eCollection 2024 May.
5
Additional Value of Mini-Cog© in Urogeriatric Patients Concurrently Screened by G8 Scores.在通过G8评分同时进行筛查的老年泌尿系统疾病患者中,简易认知评估量表(Mini-Cog©)的附加价值
Medicines (Basel). 2023 Oct 8;10(10):56. doi: 10.3390/medicines10100056.
6
Item analysis of G8 screening in uro-oncologic geriatric patients.尿路上皮癌老年患者 G8 筛查的项目分析。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2023 Jun;55(6):1441-1446. doi: 10.1007/s11255-023-03594-1. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
7
The Degree of Meeting the Needs of Older People with Frailty Syndrome in the Residential Environment in Relation to Interventions-Experimental Study.满足衰弱综合征老年人居住环境需求的程度与干预措施的关系——实验研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 16;19(18):11682. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811682.
8
Reliable Prediction of Post-Operative Complications' Rate Using the G8 Screening Tool: A Prospective Study on Elderly Patients Undergoing Surgery for Kidney Cancer.使用G8筛查工具对术后并发症发生率进行可靠预测:一项针对老年肾癌手术患者的前瞻性研究。
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 30;11(13):3785. doi: 10.3390/jcm11133785.
9
Comparison of G8 and ISAR Screening Results in Geriatric Urology.老年泌尿外科中G8与ISAR筛查结果的比较
Medicines (Basel). 2021 Jul 22;8(8):40. doi: 10.3390/medicines8080040.
10
Frailty assessment and postoperative complications in urologic oncology operations.泌尿外科肿瘤手术中的衰弱评估与术后并发症
J Frailty Sarcopenia Falls. 2020 Sep 1;5(3):57-61. doi: 10.22540/JFSF-05-057. eCollection 2020 Sep.