Department of Radiology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Medical Center East, 2-1-10 Nishiogu, Arakawa-ku, Tokyo 116-8567, Japan.
Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Br J Radiol. 2020 Jun;93(1110):20190675. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20190675. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the image quality in virtual monochromatic imaging (VMI) at 40 kilo-electron volts (keV) with three-dimensional iterative image reconstruction (3D-IIR).
A phantom study and clinical study (31 patients) were performed with dual-energy CT (DECT). VMI at 40 keV was obtained and the images were reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP), 50% adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR), and 3D-IIR. We conducted subjective and objective evaluations of the image quality with each reconstruction technique.
The image contrast-to-noise ratio and image noise in both the clinical and phantom studies were significantly better with 3D-IIR than with 50% ASiR, and with 50% ASiR than with FBP (all, < 0.05). The standard deviation and noise power spectra of the reconstructed images decreased in the order of 3D-IIR to 50% ASiR to FBP, while the modulation transfer function was maintained across the three reconstruction techniques. In most subjective evaluations in the clinical study, the image quality was significantly better with 3D-IIR than with 50% ASiR, and with 50% ASiR than with FBP (all, < 0.001). Regarding the diagnostic acceptability, all images using 3D-IIR were evaluated as being fully or probably acceptable.
The quality of VMI at 40 keV is improved by 3D-IIR, which allows the image noise to be reduced and structural details to be maintained.
The improvement of the image quality of VMI at 40 keV by 3D-IIR may increase the subjective acceptance in the clinical setting.
本研究旨在评估基于三维迭代重建(3D-IIR)的 40 千伏虚拟单色成像(VMI)的图像质量。
采用双能 CT(DECT)对模型和 31 例患者进行了研究。获得 40keV 的 VMI,并使用滤波反投影(FBP)、50%自适应统计迭代重建(ASiR)和 3D-IIR 进行图像重建。我们使用每种重建技术对图像质量进行了主观和客观评估。
在临床和模型研究中,与 50%ASiR 相比,3D-IIR 的图像对比噪声比和图像噪声均显著提高,与 FBP 相比,50%ASiR 的图像对比噪声比和图像噪声也均显著提高(均<0.05)。重建图像的标准差和噪声功率谱按 3D-IIR 到 50%ASiR 到 FBP 的顺序降低,而调制传递函数在三种重建技术中保持一致。在临床研究的大多数主观评估中,3D-IIR 的图像质量均显著优于 50%ASiR,50%ASiR 的图像质量也显著优于 FBP(均<0.001)。关于诊断可接受性,所有使用 3D-IIR 的图像均被评估为完全或可能可接受。
3D-IIR 可提高 40keV 的 VMI 质量,降低图像噪声并保持结构细节。
3D-IIR 可提高 40keV 的 VMI 图像质量,从而可能提高临床环境中的主观接受度。