Suppr超能文献

在 PACIFIC 试验中,度伐利尤单抗用于不可切除的 III 期非小细胞肺癌患者时,按肿瘤 PD-L1 表达情况的疗效。

Outcomes with durvalumab by tumour PD-L1 expression in unresectable, stage III non-small-cell lung cancer in the PACIFIC trial.

作者信息

Paz-Ares L, Spira A, Raben D, Planchard D, Cho B C, Özgüroğlu M, Daniel D, Villegas A, Vicente D, Hui R, Murakami S, Spigel D, Senan S, Langer C J, Perez B A, Boothman A-M, Broadhurst H, Wadsworth C, Dennis P A, Antonia S J, Faivre-Finn C

机构信息

Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Lung Cancer Unit CNIO-H12o, CiberOnc and Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.

Virginia Health Specialists, Fairfax, USA.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 2020 Jun;31(6):798-806. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.03.287. Epub 2020 Mar 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the PACIFIC trial, durvalumab significantly improved progression-free and overall survival (PFS/OS) versus placebo, with manageable safety, in unresectable, stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients without progression after chemoradiotherapy (CRT). We report exploratory analyses of outcomes by tumour cell (TC) programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to intravenous durvalumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks or placebo ≤12 months, stratified by age, sex, and smoking history, but not PD-L1 status. Where available, pre-CRT samples were tested for PD-L1 expression (immunohistochemistry) and scored at pre-specified (25%) and post hoc (1%) TC cut-offs. Treatment-effect hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated from unstratified Cox proportional hazards models (Kaplan-Meier-estimated medians).

RESULTS

In total, 713 patients were randomly assigned, 709 of whom received at least 1 dose of study treatment durvalumab (n = 473) or placebo (n = 236). Some 451 (63%) were PD-L1-assessable: 35%, 65%, 67%, 33%, and 32% had TC ≥25%, <25%, ≥1%, <1%, and 1%-24%, respectively. As of 31 January 2019, median follow-up was 33.3 months. Durvalumab improved PFS versus placebo (primary-analysis data cut-off, 13 February 2017) across all subgroups [HR, 95% confidence interval (CI); medians]: TC ≥25% (0.41, 0.26-0.65; 17.8 versus 3.7 months), <25% (0.59, 0.43-0.82; 16.9 versus 6.9 months), ≥1% (0.46, 0.33-0.64; 17.8 versus 5.6 months), <1% (0.73, 0.48-1.11; 10.7 versus 5.6 months), 1%-24% [0.49, 0.30-0.80; not reached (NR) versus 9.0 months], and unknown (0.59, 0.42-0.83; 14.0 versus 6.4 months). Durvalumab improved OS across most subgroups (31 January 2019 data cut-off; HR, 95% CI; medians): TC ≥ 25% (0.50, 0.30-0.83; NR versus 21.1 months), <25% (0.89, 0.63-1.25; 39.7 versus 37.4 months), ≥1% (0.59, 0.41-0.83; NR versus 29.6 months), 1%-24% (0.67, 0.41-1.10; 43.3 versus 30.5 months), and unknown (0.60, 0.43-0.84; 44.2 versus 23.5 months), but not <1% (1.14, 0.71-1.84; 33.1 versus 45.6 months). Safety was similar across subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

PFS benefit with durvalumab was observed across all subgroups, and OS benefit across all but TC <1%, for which limitations and wide HR CI preclude robust conclusions.

摘要

背景

在 PACIFIC 试验中,对于接受放化疗(CRT)后未进展的不可切除 III 期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者,度伐利尤单抗对比安慰剂显著改善了无进展生存期和总生存期(PFS/OS),且安全性可控。我们报告了按肿瘤细胞(TC)程序性死亡配体 1(PD-L1)表达进行的结局探索性分析。

患者和方法

患者按 2:1 随机分配,每 2 周静脉注射 10 mg/kg 度伐利尤单抗或安慰剂≤12 个月,按年龄、性别和吸烟史分层,但不按 PD-L1 状态分层。如有可用的 CRT 前样本,检测其 PD-L1 表达(免疫组织化学),并在预先指定的(25%)和事后(1%)TC 临界值处评分。治疗效应风险比(HR)由未分层的 Cox 比例风险模型(Kaplan-Meier 估计中位数)估计。

结果

总共 713 例患者被随机分配,其中 709 例接受了至少 1 剂研究治疗,度伐利尤单抗组(n = 473)或安慰剂组(n = 236)。约 451 例(63%)可评估 PD-L1:分别有 35%、65%、67%、33%和 32%的患者 TC≥25%、<25%、≥1%、<1%和 1%-24%。截至 2019 年 1 月 31 日,中位随访时间为 33.3 个月。在所有亚组中,度伐利尤单抗对比安慰剂均改善了 PFS(主要分析数据截止日期为 2017 年 2 月 13 日)[HR,95%置信区间(CI);中位数]:TC≥25%(0.41,0.26 - 0.65;17.8 个月对 3.7 个月),<25%(0.59,0.43 - 0.82;16.9 个月对 6.9 个月),≥1%(0.46,0.33 - 0.64;17.8 个月对 5.6 个月),<1%(0.73,0.48 - 1.11;10.7 个月对 5.6 个月),1%-24%[0.49,0.30 - 0.80;未达到(NR)对 9.0 个月],以及未知(0.59,0.42 - 0.83;14.0 个月对 6.4 个月)。在大多数亚组中,度伐利尤单抗改善了 OS(数据截止日期为 2019 年 1 月 31 日;HR,95%CI;中位数):TC≥25%(0.50,0.30 - 0.83;NR 对 21.1 个月),<25%(0.89,0.63 - 1.25;39.7 个月对 37.4 个月),≥1%(0.59,0.41 - 0.83;NR 对 29.6 个月),1%-24%(0.67,0.41 - 1.10;43.3 个月对 30.5 个月),以及未知(0.60,0.43 - 0.84;44.2 个月对 23.5 个月),但 TC<1%亚组未改善(1.14,0.71 - 1.84;33.1 个月对 45.6 个月)。各亚组的安全性相似。

结论

在所有亚组中均观察到度伐利尤单抗对 PFS 的获益,除 TC<1%亚组外,在所有亚组中均观察到对 OS 的获益,该亚组存在局限性且 HR 的置信区间较宽,无法得出确凿结论。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Immune checkpoint inhibitors: From friend to foe.免疫检查点抑制剂:从友到敌。
Toxicol Rep. 2025 Apr 24;14:102033. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2025.102033. eCollection 2025 Jun.

本文引用的文献

5
Fundamental Mechanisms of Immune Checkpoint Blockade Therapy.免疫检查点阻断治疗的基本机制。
Cancer Discov. 2018 Sep;8(9):1069-1086. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-18-0367. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
6
Regulation and Function of the PD-L1 Checkpoint.PD-L1 检查点的调控与功能
Immunity. 2018 Mar 20;48(3):434-452. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.03.014.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验