Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine & George E. Whalen VA Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Sep;35(9):2668-2674. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05775-5. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
Patient experience is valuable because it reflects how patients perceive the care they receive within the healthcare system and is associated with clinical outcomes. Also, as part of the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (HVBP) program, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) rewards hospitals with financial incentives for patient experience as measured by the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey. It is unclear how the addition of residents and advanced practice clinicians (APCs) to hospitalist-led inpatient teams affects patient satisfaction as measured by the HCAHPS and Press Ganey survey.
To compare patient satisfaction with hospitalists on resident, APC, and solo hospitalist teams measured by HCAHPS and Press Ganey physician performance domain survey results.
Retrospective observational cohort study.
All patients discharged from the Internal Medicine inpatient service between July 1, 2015, and July 1, 2018, who met HCAHPS survey eligibility criteria and completed a patient experience survey.
HCAHPS and Press Ganey physician performance domain survey results.
No differences were observed in the selection of "top box" scores on the HCAHPS physician performance domain between resident, APC, and solo hospitalist teams. Adjusted Press Ganey physician performance domain survey results demonstrated significant differences between solo hospitalist and resident teams, with solo hospitalists having higher scores in three areas: time physician spent with you (4.58 vs. 4.38, p = 0.050); physician kept you informed (4.63 vs. 4.43, p = 0.047); and physician skill (4.80 vs. 4.63, p = 0.027). Solo hospitalists were perceived to have higher physician skill in comparison with hospitalist-APC teams (4.80 vs. 4.69, p = 0.042).
While Press Ganey survey results suggest that patients have greater satisfaction with physicians on solo hospitalist teams, these differences were not observed on the HCAHPS physician performance survey domain, suggesting physician team structure does not impact HVBP incentive payments by CMS.
患者体验很有价值,因为它反映了患者对其在医疗保健系统中所接受的护理的看法,并且与临床结果相关。此外,作为医院价值为基础的采购(HVBP)计划的一部分,医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)通过医院消费者评估医疗保健提供者和系统(HCAHPS)调查,对患者体验进行衡量,为表现出色的医院提供财务奖励。目前尚不清楚住院医师主导的住院医师团队中增加住院医师和高级实践临床医生(APC)对 HCAHPS 和 Press Ganey 调查衡量的患者满意度的影响。
通过 HCAHPS 和 Press Ganey 医生绩效调查结果,比较住院医师、APC 和单独住院医师团队的患者对住院医师的满意度。
回顾性观察队列研究。
2015 年 7 月 1 日至 2018 年 7 月 1 日期间,从内科住院服务出院的所有符合 HCAHPS 调查资格标准并完成患者体验调查的患者。
HCAHPS 和 Press Ganey 医生绩效调查结果。
在 HCAHPS 医生绩效领域的“最佳选择”评分方面,住院医师、APC 和单独住院医师团队之间没有观察到差异。调整后的 Press Ganey 医生绩效调查结果表明,单独住院医师和住院医师团队之间存在显著差异,在三个方面,单独住院医师的得分更高:医生与您共度的时间(4.58 分 vs. 4.38 分,p=0.050);医生向您通报情况(4.63 分 vs. 4.43 分,p=0.047);和医生的技能(4.80 分 vs. 4.63 分,p=0.027)。与住院医师-APC 团队相比,单独住院医师被认为医生技能更高(4.80 分 vs. 4.69 分,p=0.042)。
虽然 Press Ganey 调查结果表明,患者对单独住院医师团队的医生满意度更高,但在 HCAHPS 医生绩效调查领域并未观察到这些差异,这表明医生团队结构不会影响 CMS 的 HVBP 奖励支付。